Search for: "IAC Search " Results 41 - 60 of 203
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2016, 12:08 pm by Francis Pileggi
Answer: Yes, based on the circumstances found in the case of  IAC Search, LLC v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 3:22 pm
October 9, 2008).* IAC claim fails where defendant cannot show that the suppression motion not filed would fail. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 4:10 am
IAC claim under 2255 failed because defendant did not show how the motion to suppress that was not filed had merit. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 9:14 pm
No record that was admitted into evidence at the trial was outside a common understanding of the search warrant. [read post]
14 May 2012, 5:24 am
He alleged various grounds that the warrantless search was invalid and defense counsel was ineffective for not challenging it. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 1:58 pm by Jon Sands
No colorable claim of IAC was presented. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 7:44 pm
June 8, 2011).* Defense counsel’s failure to make a motion to suppress the search of his house was not IAC because it would have failed anyway on third party consent of the victim. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:22 am
Contrary to defendant's assertion, defense counsel did file a motion to suppress and it was considered on the merits and denied, so he cannot raise IAC on this ground. [read post]
25 Dec 2009, 10:04 pm
.* Defendant’s search argument was belatedly raised ten years late in a post-conviction IAC claim that should have been raised earlier. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 10:57 am by Dave
Friday was a good day for AOL, Google, IAC Search & Media, Gannet Company, and Target. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 7:58 am
LEXIS 1073 (July 21, 2009).* No IAC for not pursuing a search and seizure claim where defendant lacked standing. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 6:01 am
June 11, 2007).* No IAC for defense counsel's failure to get a plea agreement for defendant where the defendant never wanted to plead guilty. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 8:34 am
December 18, 2007).* Defense counsel was not ineffective for not filing a suppression motion because it would not prevail on the merits, which the court determines under the IAC claim. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 2:08 am
" Here, it is clear from the record defendant consented so there could be no IAC. [read post]