Search for: "IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co." Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2009, 2:02 pm
CIVIL PROCEDURE, COMMUNICATIONS LAW, CONTRACTS, INJURY AND TORT LAW IDT Corp. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 4:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
There is no single statute of limitations for causes of action alleging breach of fiduciary duty (see IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d 132, 139; Matter of Hersh, 198 AD3d [*2]766, 769). [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 1:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
To determine timeliness, we consider whether plaintiff’s complaint must, as a matter of law, be read to allege damages suffered so early as to render the claim time-barred” IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d 132,139 [2009]. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 3:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accordingly, the appellant's counterclaims against those defendants were time-barred (see CPLR 213[1], [7]; 214[4], [6]; IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d 132, 139; North Fork Preserve, Inc. v Kaplan, 31 AD3d 403, 405). [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 4:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” As such, we find no abuse of discretion in Supreme Court’s determination that a three-year limitations period applies to defendant’s breach of fiduciary duty claim, which seeks purely monetary relief (see IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d 132, 139 [2009]). [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 4:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
They state a claim for malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty–both of which have a three-year statute of limitations because defendants exclusively seek monetary damages (IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d 132, 139 [2009]; Matter of R.M Kliment & Frances Hals band, Architects, 3 NY3d 538, 541 [2004]). [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
With respect to the breach of fiduciary duty causes of action, “where an allegation of fraud is essential to a breach of fiduciary duty claim, courts have applied a six-year statute of limitations under CPLR 213 (8)” (IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d 132, 139 [2009], rearg denied 12 NY3d 889 [2009]; see Monaghan v Ford Motor Co., 71 AD3d 848, 849-850 [2d Dept… [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” (IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d 132, 139 [2009).) [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” (IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d 132, 139 [2009).) [read post]