Search for: "IN RE: AMENDMENT TO THE OKLAHOMA SUPREME COURT RULES" Results 61 - 80 of 278
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2010, 9:28 am by Steve Hall
"But the Supreme Court has never held that it violates the Eighth Amendment to execute someone who is actually innocent. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 10:30 pm by Jeff Gamso
Friday afternoon, the Supreme Court announced that it would hear Glossip v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 4:12 am by SHG
Law professor Eugene Volokh, whose writings have been cited by the Supreme Court, notes “that the flyers consisted solely of the messages ‘It’s OK to be white’ and ‘Islam is right about women,’” and that “such messages are of course fully protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm by Megan Russo
Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal of a lower court ruling that upheld a U.S. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
The 5-4 majority in the Supreme Court maintained that courts should not issue rulings that change election procedures so close to election day. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 4:42 am by Susan Brenner
Olmstead, __ P.3d ___,  2012 WL 3930682 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma 2012) (State v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
Sineneng-Smith, arguing that “[u]nless and until Justice Thomas abandons the modern First Amendment entirely, one should regard with extreme skepticism his call for the re-examination of specific doctrines–like overbreadth and the rule of NY Times v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The majority was led to that conclusion by two Supreme Court rulings based upon the “political process” rationale. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 9:30 pm by Claire Hill
A federal judge in Oklahoma ruled that the state’s lethal injection method is constitutional. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm by John Elwood
But the North Carolina Supreme Court, over a vigorous dissent, reversed, upholding Packingham’s conviction. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am by John Elwood
We’re now in the middle of the Supreme Court’s nearly month-long midwinter hiatus between conferences. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:10 am by Josh Blackman
The Court, by a 6-3 vote, ruled that the prohibition on indoor worship violated the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. [read post]
16 May 2019, 9:05 pm by Bobby Chen
Holden of Oklahoma State University discussed the regulation of sports betting following the Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 3:17 pm by NARF
Kills Warrior (Double Jeopardy; Tribal Court Jurisdiction) Tribal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/tribal/2023.html In re RLG (Child Placement; Guardian Ad Litem) Henderson v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 8:18 am by Steve Hall
Robert Barnes writes, "Supreme Court restricts life without parole for juveniles," for the Washington Post. [read post]
16 May 2014, 1:12 am by Kevin LaCroix
The defendants allege that the ruling of the Swiss court is preclusive of the plaintiff’s claims under the doctrine of res judicata and principles of international comity. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 5:48 am
Other courts recognized that the simplistic rulings in these early cases ignored reality (most plaintiffs don't read available warnings - that's why they're plaintiffs), as well as the nature of warnings where an unavoidably unsafe product was involved. [read post]