Search for: "IN RE: ARNOLD KING"
Results 21 - 40
of 100
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2018, 5:56 am
“From a law enforcement perspective, we’re very much concerned that we’re sending the wrong message to young people that there would be an acceptable time to drink and drive, that it’s okay, and how do you let them know that that doesn’t translate to public roadways? [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:32 pm
Arnold "The bearers came to take me to my new husband’s house, and I felt a joy all through my body Instead the bearers have carried me into a deep forest No one I know is here"[1] Introduction [Preface - I am embarking on one of the most important series of articles I have written for the EnlightenedDivorceBlog™. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 8:02 am
Beyer’s article Estate Planning for Digital Assets was cited in What may be the trust res? [read post]
5 May 2017, 2:56 pm
Arnold Schwarzenegger. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
Come to UCL IBIL's copyright panel on Wednesday | After Sweden and Germany, GS Media finds its application in the Czech RepublicNever Too Late 134 [week ending on Sunday 5 February] | Around the IP Blogs | King Tut's tomb: conservation or replication (but don't forget the "aura")? [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 3:31 am
I After Sweden and Germany, GS Media finds its application in the Czech RepublicNever Too Late 134 [week ending on Sunday 5 February] | King Tut's tomb: conservation or replication (but don't forget the "aura")? [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 11:15 pm
PREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 134 [week ending on Sunday 5 February] | King Tut's tomb: conservation or replication (but don't forget the "aura")? [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 9:50 pm
King Tut's tomb: conservation or replication (but don't forget the "aura")? [read post]
8 May 2016, 9:45 am
Moderate-sized regional firms have joined forces (think Syracuse’s Bond Schoeneck & King and Buffalo’s Jaekle Fleischmann & Mugle); larger firms have devoured smaller and medium-sized practices (think Arnold & Porter and my own dear departed Howard Rice); and we’ve even had a bit of an international orgy among the giants (while you’re trying to get that image out of your head, think DLA Piper; Hogan Lovells; Dacheng Dentons). [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 3:37 am
Cf., In re Arnold, 105 USPQ2d 1953, 1956 (TTAB 2013) (requiring evidence that a title is used on at least two different creative works). [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 10:07 am
Baum countered that in the King James Version Salomé asked for the head, “by and by. [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
Well it's not bad for a Distance Learning Course in CopyrightThe King's College’s crew of leading copyright practitioners and academics is back in harness and ready to teach the 2015/2016 version of the Distance Learning Course in Copyright, Jeremy reports.* No toleration for Novartis - rivastigmine patch patent declared invalidDarren writes up Mr Justice Arnold’s fresh decision in Novartis v Focus, Actavis, Teva [2015] EWHC 1068 (Pat).No cats are… [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:15 am
The minor thesis is that we need to re-think our approach to copyright law reform. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:15 am
The challenges, however, hit their own high water mark when the Supreme Court granted review in King v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:20 am
Not only did the Dutch Court disagree with the Courts of England and Wales on the matter of priority entitlement and hence validity , but also this ruling appears to be in contrast to the case last week [for which see Katpost here for the first instance and here and here for the appeal judgment] where Arnold J permitted Actavis to launch a product with a skinny label without requiring further measures such as… [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
.* No pain for Actavis: Warner-Lambert fail to stop launch of generic pregabalinSecond medical use claims, skinny labels, and public policy issues around healthcare are the topics addressed in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 72 (Pat) (21 January 2015), a decision that Mr Justice Arnold has just delivered and on which Darren timely comments in this post.* BREAKING NEWS: CJEU says exhaustion only applies to the tangible medium of a work… [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:09 am
Anyway, here they are:* A film about Martin Luther King without King's actual words: is it really a copyright problem? [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
The primary track is the “official business, or topics of discourse”—the substance of what we want to say.12 A secondary, or collateral, track refers to the act of speaking itself: “to timing, delays, re-phrasings, mistakes, repairs, intentions to speak, and the like. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
We're all a bit exhausted and expect that our readers are too. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 4:05 am
Jeremy gives the floor to Bill Ladas (King & Wood Mallesons), who compares two groups of decisions of OHIM Fourth and Fifth Boards of Appeal, concerning registrability of fanciful animals’ devices as 2D and 3D trade marks. [read post]
