Search for: "IN RE: CODE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR INTERPRETERS"
Results 81 - 100
of 355
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2021, 9:10 am
Possess a relevant professional certification to include Certified Information System Auditor(CISA), Certified Information System Security Professional (CISSP), Certified Public Accountant (CPA), and/or Certified Internal Auditor (CIA) 3. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 5:37 am
The last charge is the only one we’re concerned with. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 2:53 pm
Without the rule perhaps the sense of collective responsibility would wither. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 2:42 am
So they're banging their heads at the next wall. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:08 pm
A strict reading of both would interpret the role of CPSO narrowly, to focus [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 12:34 pm
” to discuss Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996, its expansive interpretation by the courts, and whether improvements to the law should be made. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 8:12 am
Possess a relevant professional certification to include Certified Information System Auditor(CISA), Certified Information System Security Professional (CISSP), Certified Public Accountant (CPA), and/or Certified Internal Auditor (CIA) 3. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 3:25 pm
The advocate, in the words of the 1969 Code of Professional Responsibility, "should resolve in favor of his client doubts as to the bounds of the law. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 2:35 pm
Shrader & Associates, LLP v. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 9:00 am
” Business and Professions Code section 2400, within the Medical Practice Act, provides in pertinent part: “Corporations and other artificial entities shall have no professional rights, privileges, or powers. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
§§ 1011–1015, exempts Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code section 74.451 from being preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 3:12 pm
But we can also make interpretative uses: looking at hypothetical situations. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm
After receiving Orascom's and Natgasoline's response, this court denied Refractory Construction's motion to dismiss. [read post]
23 May 2016, 4:12 am
“Clearly, there seems to be a lack of knowledge about or adherence to the duties of professional responsibility in the halls of the Justice Department,” Hanen wrote. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 2:00 am
” (See 29 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) § 541.302(a).) [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 10:54 am
In McAward, the Board asserted that its “lower threshold” approach to claim interpretation during examination “makes good sense,” precisely because “an applicant may freely amend claims” in response to broadly interpreted claims. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 12:44 pm
The purpose of the Circular Letter is to advise no-fault insurers and health insurers of the amendment of Insurance Law §5103(b)(2) and to interpret the regulations related thereto. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 8:13 am
The term “reportable payment transaction” is defined in the Regs (the Regs are the official interpretation of the Tax Code by IRS) to mean “any payment card transaction… and any third party network transaction” as further explained in the Regs (isn’t tax law fun?). [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 7:07 am
We put in some language that hopefully lets the bad guys know we’re looking over their shoulders. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 1:36 pm
If we’re lucky enough to hire you, you’ll be a part of the Center’s four-person leadership team, where you’ll help shape the Center’s overall programming and strategy. [read post]
