Search for: "IN RE: PRIVACY AND PUBLIC ACCESS TO COURT DOCUMENTS [WITHDRAWN]" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2022, 4:30 am by privacylawyer
In the federal public sector, there is a separate Privacy Act and an Access to Information Act. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:25 pm by Barry Sookman
The court in Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner [2014] IEHC 310 (18 June 2014), questioned whether the Directive and the EU Commissioner’s Decision needed to be re-evaluated in the light of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and whether the Commissioner could look beyond or otherwise disregard the Community finding. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 8:31 am
So why are they allowed to disregard this and other documents? [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 8:51 am by Dave Maass
Freedom of Information—the concept that government documents belong to and must be accessible to the people—has never not been cool. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
But in just the last decade, religious and moral opposition to contraception seems to have re-emerged.Trump’s Campaign Against Reproductive RightsThe Trump Administration has already imposed several measures that have the purpose or effect of restricting access to contraception. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 10:09 am by Patricia Hughes
Access to justice for the most urgent matters must always remain available. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 3:28 am by INFORRM
The Court conducted a proportionality test, balancing the right to privacy against the public interest in disclosure, to find that the requested information regarding the functioning of the Supreme Court and judicial assets should be released in the name of transparency and accountability, but that information related to third-parties needed to be re-examined. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 12:01 pm
  Moreover, pragmatism produces a document that might be adopted; but the price can be high, especially as it might detract (and detract substantially) from the ideological vision shaping the "pure" version of the treaty (pure that is in the eyes of those who share a specific vision and who have the will and the power to see it through to a polished and complete draft). [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 12:31 pm by Alex R. McQuade
The Hill shares that “the measure—a response to concerns that criminals are increasingly using encrypted devices to hide from authorities—would require firms to comply with court orders seeking access to locked data. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 10:43 am by Tara Hofbauer
”According to the Hill, the Senate bill limits how much data the NSA can request, creates a panel of advocates to argue in support of privacy rights and civil liberties in front of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, and requires the court to issue public summaries of its decisions. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
"Findlaw summaries [may] include opoinions that have not yet been released for publication and may be subject to modification, correction or withdrawl". [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Some states have alleged that ICSID is biased, withdrawn from the ICSID Convention, and advocated creating alternative arbitration systems. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
What makes ransomware attacks so distinctive is that the corporate victim never loses possession of the data, merely access to it. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Some states have alleged that ICSID is biased, withdrawn from the ICSID Convention, and advocated creating alternative arbitration systems. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
Both Canada and the Netherlands have found the RIAA's investigation too flimsy to warrant the invasion of subscriber privacy. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:03 am by Barry Sookman
CASL should not compromise or impair, but should promote, the protection of privacy and the security of confidential information. [read post]