Search for: "IN RE: RULES FOR THE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL ELECTIONS"
Results 81 - 100
of 660
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2014, 9:49 am
The Department of Justice is asking a judicial committee to amend Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, which generally permits magistrate judges to issue search warrants to the government only for searches within their judicial district. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 12:38 pm
Chief Justice Ronald George announced a week ago that he would not be seeking re-election this November (California Supreme Court justices stand for a yes or no re-election vote every twelve years). [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 8:17 am
The answer to this question turns in part on the outcome of the November elections. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 11:33 am
Another way of thinking about this, is that the police are meant to be apolitical, not used as a tool by the elected executive. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 4:01 am
The upper house of the Province of Canada, the Legislative Council, underwent reform to hold elections for new seats in 1856. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:39 pm
Res. 19, Tuesday, June 3, 2014, Washington, D.C. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 6:43 pm
(And if you come to this blog for my take on Hobby Lobby, you're going to be seriously disappointed.)As a project, the one Epps set himself isn't bad. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 4:05 pm
It shall not be the general rule that persons awaiting trial shall be detained in custody, but release may be subject to guarantees to appear for trial, at any other stage of the judicial proceedings, and, should occasion arise, for execution of the judgement. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 6:36 am
"The rules are understood by judicial candidates to prohibit announcing their views. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
As Jonathan David Shaub explains in Lawfare, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Nixon v. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 11:29 am
The Council of Europe will bear the travel and subsistence expenses of one representative from each member State (two in the case of the state whose representative has been elected Chair). [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 5:10 am
-- majority rule. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am
Counting last week’s Cawthorn ruling, Section 3 challenges have now generated two state and three federal judicial rulings—the first opinions on Section 3 in a century and a half. [read post]
20 Jan 2007, 6:51 am
"We're watching this case very closely. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 9:39 am
Biden, a longtime member of the Senate Judiciary Committee before his election to the vice presidency, declared in 2007 that “We have enough professors on the bench . . . [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 8:02 am
Nassour added: “The governor has over stepped his constitutional boundaries, and we’re hoping that the judge rules in our favor. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:46 am
In order to reach the decision, five justices abandoned longstanding judicial principles, judicial precedents and judicial restraint. [read post]
9 May 2016, 12:52 pm
” Let’s set aside whether the American people had already raised their voice by overwhelmingly re-electing President Obama in 2012 – after Sen. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 10:34 am
Judicial Watch applauds any measures—such as voter ID requirements—that help keep the election process free of corruption. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
It is unbecoming for elected officials to avoid their constitutional obligation (see New York Constitution, Article 6, sec. 25), to a co-equal branch of government for petty and personal reasons. [read post]
