Search for: "IN RE: RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT ON LEGAL INTERNSHIP"
Results 1 - 20
of 48
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2020, 7:45 am
Supreme Court of Alabama, In re: July 2020 Alabama Bar Examination (May 8, 2020): [A]pplicants shall be eligible to participate as student interns, as defined by the Alabama Rule for Legal Internship by Law Students, by satisfying all requirements of said rule, with the following temporary exceptions: 1. [read post]
3 Apr 2021, 7:09 am
” The post Supreme Court hears arguments over paying college athletes appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 6:07 am
* With a sharp focus on the Supreme Court and the legal definition of equality, only one thing’s for sure with respect to this week’s anticipated rulings: at least one group of people is probably going to get screwed. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 6:35 am
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter for Wednesday, March 6, 2013:Unpaid internships: the most precarious work of all Star investigation: Toronto driving schools bending the rules to make a buck SlawTips Tuesday Arthur Porter was a federal Tory donor while chair of Canada spy watchdog New Mexico Judge resigns after admitting improper IMs with wife during court, but denies steamy content Elliot Lake mall inquiry told engineers… [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:51 pm
However, after the Court’s ruling, quantitative goals may face greater legal risks than qualitative ones. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Health Res., Inc., 143 S. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 7:48 am
Patent and Trademark Office, or the Supreme Court of Oklahoma has certified the lawyer as a specialist. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 7:48 am
Patent and Trademark Office, or the Supreme Court of Oklahoma has certified the lawyer as a specialist. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Health Res., Inc., 143 S. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 11:09 am
” Stewart Baker shared the most recent episode of the Cyberlaw Podcast, featuring an interview with Richard Clarke and Robert Knake on their new book, a news roundup including a recent Supreme Court ruling, Facebook’s proposed cryptocurrency and more. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
Supreme Court, on June 29, 2015, in a 5 to 4 ruling, held in Michigan v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 11:01 am
That can be a loaded question when we’re talking about a legal career. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 11:01 am
That can be a loaded question when we’re talking about a legal career. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 12:55 am
Low-Profile Supreme Court Case Offers Glimpse of Sharp Divide
Legal Times
The case of Bowles v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:27 am
For more information regarding law firm disqualification due to the paralegal's possession of attorney-client confidences, see In Re Guaranty Insurance Services, Inc., Relator (No. 10-0364), where the Texas Supreme Court, on July 1, 2011 handed down a decision granting mandamus relief and directing the trial court to vacate its order granting the motion to disqualify. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 4:32 am
If you’re in the Cleveland area, you have three chances to catch Fake ID this month. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 2:20 pm
It's not like they're making snap evidentiary rulings from a trial bench or anything. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 11:29 am
Supreme Court Decision, Lingle v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm
" Supreme Court (2021): That Story fella seems like he knows what's up. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:13 am
The position was restated by the Supreme Court in The State (Nicolaou) v An Bord Uchtala [1966] IR 567 when Walsh J opined that “An illegitimate child has the same natural rights as a legitimate child though not necessarily the same legal rights”. [read post]