Search for: "IN RE A N D WILLIAMS MINOR" Results 1 - 20 of 95
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2008, 2:38 pm
UPDATE:  Here's the California Supreme Court Opinion thanks to the American Constitutional Society Blog with Yale Law School Professor William N. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm
Again, we have come to bury Cuba's Caribbean Marxism, not to praise it (William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar Act III, scene II). [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 9:44 pm by KC Johnson
The William Kennedy Smith case, in which all sides admitted that sexual contact occurred, and in which a reasonable person could (though I’d argue shouldn’t) conclude that a sexual assault likely took place; d.) [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:34 am by Eugene Volokh
[I need to send this brief to the printer tomorrow, but I'd love to have any feedback today on how it can be improved or corrected.] [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 4:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
National Ass’n of AGs issues a monthly report on cases, to which one can subscribe. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
McIntosh, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Friday, July 29, 2022 Tags: Institutional Investors, Proxy advisors, Proxy voting, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation, Shareholder voting Statement by Chair Gensler on Re-Proposed Amendments Regarding Exemption from National Securities Association Membership Posted by Gary Gensler, U.S. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
McIntosh, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Friday, July 29, 2022 Tags: Institutional Investors, Proxy advisors, Proxy voting, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation, Shareholder voting Statement by Chair Gensler on Re-Proposed Amendments Regarding Exemption from National Securities Association Membership Posted by Gary Gensler, U.S. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 8:17 pm by TDot
The Metcalfe Effect in computer science: for a network of (n) nodes, the total number of possible connections is (n * (n - 1)) / 2 You can see a visual depiction in the photo on the right. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
Sure, we'd love it if one or more of the Supreme Court's opinions in pending cases were to do away with the Lohr language altogether, but we're not holding our breath. [read post]