Search for: "IN RE A N TUCKER MINOR" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am by David Kopel
As detailed in a pair of previous posts, the mainstream historical tradition for controversial arms such Bowie knives and slungshots was to forbid concealed carry, to restrict sales to minors (especially without parental consent), or to impose extra punishment for misuse. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm by Bexis
 This waiver argument was supported by a few Superior Court (that’s Pennsylvania’s intermediate appellate court) cases from between 2004 and 2007 (Tucker v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  The learned intermediary rule could be Bob Dylan (I know, we’re showing our age, here). [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative Law Source: Justia September 23, 2011 Gonzalez-Droz v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, July 18, 2008 In re Sims, No. 06-0644 In an inmate's 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action alleging excessive force, inmate's petition for writ of mandamus challenging an order requiring him to produce his mental health records is granted because: 1) a plaintiff does not forfeit the psychotherapist-patient privilege merely by asserting a claim for injuries that do not include emotional damage, or by stating that he suffers from depression or anxiety for… [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:18 pm by Clayton Simms, Criminal Defense Attorney
AS APPLIED TO THE DEFENDANTS IN THESE CASES, SALT LAKE CITY’S ORDINANCES RE PARK CURFEW AND DISORDERLY CONDUCT VIOLATE THEIR FREEDOM OF SPEECH RIGHTS AS PROTECTED BY THE UTAH CONSTITUTION. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 12:55 pm by William Ford, Tia Sewell
West and Associate Professor of History at the University of Pittsburgh Keisha N. [read post]