Search for: "IN RE ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT TO RULE 6-1(a) OF THE RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT AND COURT OF APPEALS" Results 41 - 60 of 463
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2009, 2:53 pm
Although the Hawaii trial judge did rule in favor of same-sex marriage, the state legislature responded by swiftly proposing a constitutional amendment to overrule the court, which was overwhelmingly adopted by the people of Hawaii the following year while the state supreme court cooperatively stalled in scheduling a hearing on the state's appeal of the decision. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:00 am
See In re Erie COVID-19 Business Interruption Protection Insurance Litigation, No. 1:21-mc-1 (W.D. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 3:05 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
 Amendments to section 11 of the ACA – In order to ensure speedy appointment of arbitrators, section 11 may be amended to provide that the appointment of arbitrator(s) under the section shall only be done by arbitral institution(s) designated by the Supreme Court (in case of international commercial arbitrations) or the High Court (in case of all other arbitrations) for such purpose, without the Supreme… [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 3:00 am
After Wofsy removed the action to federal court, the district court dismissed the case with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 8:18 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
Under Const 1963, art 6, § 1, it has an obligation to exercise the judicial power to decide the dispute before it. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:01 am by Deanne Sowter
The Supreme Court has not yet acknowledged the myth of false allegations of IPV in the family law context, however. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:36 am
Eu (Cal. 1991), the California Supreme Court considered a challenge to Proposition 140, “The Political Reform Act of 1990,” a California constitutional amendment adopted by initiative. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 4:41 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York held in In re Dr. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 9:30 pm
The Supreme Court has now re-established the decision of the second arbitration committee, finding that the decision was reasonable. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm by admin
The United States Court of Appeals explained its understanding of complexity that should remove a case from the province of the seventh amendment: “A suit is too complex for a jury when circumstances render the jury unable to decide in a proper manner. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 11:57 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
According to Zanios, it had provided sufficient consideration to form a valid arbitration agreement with Mendivil by agreeing: (1) to binding arbitration; (2) to be bound by the result; (3) to arbitrate in a particular venue; (4) to have arbitration conducted under particular rules; (5) to pay for one-half of the arbitration fee; (6) to pay its own attorney's fees and costs; and (7) to forego recovery of its attorney's fees. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 8:26 am by MBettman
On February 9, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of Pamela Argabrite v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 10:41 pm by Orin Kerr
While the case is on direct appeal, however, the Supreme Court disagrees with the circuit precedent and rules that the search is legal. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
Supreme Court, on June 29, 2015, in a 5 to 4 ruling, held in Michigan v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:44 am by Andrew Frisch
Section 1 requires agencies to use the same procedures when they amend or repeal a rule as they used to issue the rule, see 5 U. [read post]