Search for: "IN RE ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT TO RULE 6-1(a) OF THE RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT AND COURT OF APPEALS" Results 81 - 100 of 463
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2010, 1:04 pm by Francis G.X. Pileggi
Under Article 5, Section 6 of Airgas’s charter, “[a]ny Bylaws made by the Directors . . . may be altered, amended or repealed by the Directors or by the stockholders. [read post]
  The rules being interpreted for the purpose of this application are the rules as at September 2008, although it is worth noting that CASS has since been substantially amended. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:28 am
  The court considered mobile broadband as now generally available to the public as evidenced by the common use of smartphones that provide both voice and data services. [12]The majority decision strongly rejected the argument that the FCC’s Open Internet rules   impermissibly constrain Internet Service Provider First Amendment freedom:Common carriers have long been subject to nondiscrimination and equal access obligations akin to those imposed by the… [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 1:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
In so ruling, the Superior Court also cited to the federal case of In re Adelphia Communications, No. 02-1781 (E.D. [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
| Swiss Supreme Court Confirms Preliminary Injunction in Kivexa case | Non-traditional trademarks and other amendments to the Mexican IP Law (First Part) | BREAKING: Unwired Planet v Huawei Part III: Huawei is given permission to appeal to the Supreme Court | Singapore's "FinTech Fast Track" initiative is doing swimmingly well, thank you | IP and the Competition and Consumer Protection Act 2019 (Nigeria) | IP plays a role in… [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 11:16 am by Kirk Jenkins
The initiative proponent than appealed, filed a motion to transfer the case straight to the Supreme Court and a motion to expedite the appeal, both of which were granted. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
| Swiss Supreme Court Confirms Preliminary Injunction in Kivexa case | Non-traditional trademarks and other amendments to the Mexican IP Law (First Part) | BREAKING: Unwired Planet v Huawei Part III: Huawei is given permission to appeal to the Supreme Court | Singapore's "FinTech Fast Track" initiative is doing swimmingly well, thank you | IP and the Competition and Consumer Protection Act 2019 (Nigeria) | IP plays a role in… [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
  These amendments to this expert discovery Rule incorporated the law of Barrick v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  These amendments to this expert discovery Rule incorporated the law of Barrick v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 10:21 am by Mark Ashton
 In 1911 a unanimous Supreme Court ruled that it would not hear a case involving Indian affairs where the court found the two parties before the court were not adverse but merely seeking an advisory opinion. [read post]