Search for: "IN RE ADOPTION OF B.R" Results 121 - 140 of 190
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2019, 9:07 am by J. Ross Pepper
Of particular weight in the Business Court’s decision was the opinion of the bankruptcy court for the Southern District of New York in In re Adelphia Commc’ns Corp., 376 B.R. 87 (2007). [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 4:08 pm by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
In 2014, in the bankruptcy case of In re Bifani, a debtor in bankruptcy fraudulently transferred property to his cohabitating girlfriend. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 7:11 am by Eugene Volokh
I thought I'd pass along a long excerpt from this amicus brief, which my students Samantha Frazier, Katelyn Taira, and Jacob Haas and I wrote on behalf of the First Amendment Coalition and myself; for more on the decision below, which indeed rejected pseudonymity, see here. [* * *] Summary of Argument John Doe is trying to punish Jane Doe … for accusing him of sexual assault. [read post]
18 Apr 2006, 3:50 pm by Frodnesor
post, where we mentioned the Hubbard, 333 B.R. 377, Valdez, 335 B.R. 801, and Rios, 336 B.R. 177 cases, all of which have effectively held that a filing by a debtor who has not completed the counseling requirements should be stricken, such that it will not count as a prior case in the event of a subsequent filing (the Valdez case actually "dismisses" rather than "strikes", but nonetheless makes clear that it will not be considered as a "case in… [read post]
18 Apr 2006, 3:50 pm by Frodnesor
post, where we mentioned the Hubbard, 333 B.R. 377, Valdez, 335 B.R. 801, and Rios, 336 B.R. 177 cases, all of which have effectively held that a filing by a debtor who has not completed the counseling requirements should be stricken, such that it will not count as a prior case in the event of a subsequent filing (the Valdez case actually "dismisses" rather than "strikes", but nonetheless makes clear that it will not be considered as a "case in… [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 1:51 pm by Joseph Sano
Chartis also notes that two such decisions (allowing assignment) are pending before the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, citing In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc., 385 B.R. 560, 567 (Bankr. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 6:07 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Finally, PROMESA expressly permits the Commonwealth to adopt a fiscal plan that incorporates the fiscal plans of other instrumentalities, and it is possible that the oversight board, whose determinations are nonreviewable (as discussed below), may approve a fiscal plan that effectively treats the Commonwealth and other Commonwealth issuers as substantively consolidated. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 7:40 pm by Norma Duenas
In my last blog post I referred to a published opinion from February 2016 by a bankruptcy judge in Sacramento, In re Ferreira, 549 B.R. 232 (E.D. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:45 am by Carter Ruml
The court did not adopt this interpretation, because doing so would require it to “read [KRS 426.190] in isolation and disregard the decisions of the Kentucky courts in Hoffmann, [Barton, and Hayes].”  [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 4:15 am
The approach adopted by the In re Asia Global court and every other court we surveyed, focuses on the effect that the company policy had on the employee's expectation of confidentiality. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 8:57 am by Bob Eisenbach
The Ninth Circuit adopted the December 2007 opinion of the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, In re SNTL Corp., 380 B.R. 204 (9th Cir. [read post]
18 Aug 2006, 2:30 pm by Frodnesor
Notwithstanding the sua sponte opinion in In re Attorneys At Law and Debt Relief Agencies, 332 B.R. 66 (Bankr. [read post]