Search for: "IN RE AMENDMENTS TO RULES FOR COURT OF TAX REVIEW"
Results 1 - 20
of 978
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am
The rule was amended to eliminate what many reviled as a “trap for the unwary. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am
The rule was amended to eliminate what many reviled as a “trap for the unwary. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 12:47 pm
The Supreme Court agreed with the tax administration in a number of decisions issued in respect of transactions taking place under the newly reenacted and amended estate and gift statute. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 10:17 am
Google The post Court Quashes 512(h) Subpoena on First Amendment Grounds–In re 512(h) Subpoena to Twitter appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 6:52 pm
In In re Hamlin, the Ninth U.S. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
” WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a recent article in the Vanderbilt Law Review, Allison M. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 3:20 pm
The Supreme Court ruled with a 5-4 majority that, “DOMA is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 7:24 am
Yesterday afternoon, the Court issued anoticethat the quorum of Justices that heard argument in the case did not reach a majority decision, and that the case will be re-argued before the Court as now composed.The composition of the Court has changed significantly since the April 5 argument.Three of the Court's seven justices (Justices Spina, Cordy and Duffly) retired and three new justices (Justices Budd, Lowy and Graziano) joined the… [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 7:24 am
Yesterday afternoon, the Court issued a notice that the quorum of Justices that heard argument in the case did not reach a majority decision, and that the case will be re-argued before the Court as now composed.The composition of the Court has changed significantly since the April 5 argument. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 1:03 pm
The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in the case In re McCoy, 666 F.3d 924 (5th Cir. 2012) and the 10th Circuit in the case In re Mallo, 2014 WL 7360130 (10th Cir. 2014), reviewed the above paragraph and, in particular, the term “applicable filing requirements”. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 7:24 am
Yesterday afternoon, the Court issued a notice that the quorum of Justices that heard argument in the case did not reach a majority decision, and that the case will be re-argued before the Court as now composed.The composition of the Court has changed significantly since the April 5 argument. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:55 pm
In the center of the new review is an Arizona program that has been under constitutional challenge for a generation and has been to the Court twice before, but that has not yet led to a ruling on its validity. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 9:03 pm
” WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In an article in the Vanderbilt Law Review, Monika U. [read post]
16 May 2024, 9:05 pm
The post Week in Review first appeared on The Regulatory Review. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:48 pm
For example, they address a reported claim from an administrator in OIRA that the decision is merely a “‘return to what had been the status quo’” for about 40-years and clarify that OIRA had always played at least a small part in tax regulation review, and that this decision would be the first time OIRA has no role in tax review regulation. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 2:27 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, one of the options for the SEC in light of the court's adverse First Amendment ruling is to seek en banc review of the decision of the three-judge panel. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 2:34 pm
His essay examines the intellectual re-discovery of the Second Amendment by the legal academy and the courts during the late 20th century, following the Burger Court period of ignoring the right to arms. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 10:07 am
The term “public assistance benefit” is not defined under Missouri law, so the court reviewed the history of the Additional Child Tax Credit, especially the legislative history of recent amendments favoring lower income taxpayers. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 9:08 pm
Department of Defense failed to comply with a previous court ruling. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
”6 Although the Fourteenth Amendment gave federal courts the opportunity to review state takings, the Court continued a pattern of deference to state judgments of what constitutes a proper taking. [read post]
