Search for: "IN RE E.O." Results 61 - 73 of 73
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm by Steve Vladeck
By Marty Lederman and Steve Vladeck* [Cross-posted at OpinioJuris] Section 1021 of the NDAA and the Laws of War In our companion post, we explained that section 1021 of the NDAA will not have the dramatic effects that many critics have predicted–in particular, that it will not affect the unresolved question of whether the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) would authorize a future President to place a U.S citizen or resident who is apprehended in the United States in… [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm by Marty Lederman
by Marty Lederman By Marty Lederman and Steve Vladeck* Section 1021 of the NDAA and the Laws of War In our companion post, we explained that section 1021 of the NDAA will not have the dramatic effects that many critics have predicted–in particular, that it will not affect the unresolved question of whether the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) would authorize a future President to place a U.S citizen or resident who is apprehended in the United States in long-term military… [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:33 pm
Presidents Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, and Ronald Reagan issued executive orders (E.O. 11905 (1976), E.O. 12036 (1978), and E.O. 12333 (1981), respectively) banning assassination. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:16 pm
By the terms of the E.O., this periodic review will not apply to future detainees. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 1:37 pm
 Since if we're writing probation conditions -- or anything else -- that read like that, we're in trouble.So I'm on completely board for Justice Rushing's sentiments. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 9:22 pm
The HIV ban removal will be remembered as a historic decision, through this final rule, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), within the U.S. [read post]
21 May 2009, 4:35 am
Every draft final regulation submitted to OMB must have a certification that the rule was developed in compliance with E.O. 13132. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 1:04 pm
We're not administrative lawyers, so we're really out of our depth. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 3:20 pm
In his two-paragraph letter, Addington writes that the E.O. [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 3:56 pm
(After all, if the President does wish to exempt the VP's Office, he could do so with a stroke of the pen -- as far as I know, there's no statute that requires the VP to comply with the procedures in the E.O. [read post]
9 May 2007, 10:17 am
At the TED conference this year biologist E.O. [read post]