Search for: "IN RE G G WILLIAMS MINOR" Results 1 - 20 of 120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2013, 10:31 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Former Los Angeles Chief of Police William Bratton, who refused to participate in 287(g), perhaps summarized the negative impact of 287(g) best—in Davidson County and across the country—when he said, “Criminals are the biggest beneficiaries when immigrants fear the police. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 11:08 pm
"It's critically important to have an Obama justice who can be a counterpoint to [Chief Justice John G.] [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:34 am
William Cushman, a vice principal of FHS, received a text message from a former student informing him of tweets indicating that someone was going to shoot up the school. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 8:01 am
William Cushman, a vice principal of FHS, received a text message from a former student informing him of tweets indicating that someone was going to shoot up the school. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 3:17 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Lauterpacht, Hersch, "The Function of Law in the International Community" - Reviewer: Feichtner, IsabelZifcak, Spencer, "United Nations Reform; Heading North or South"; Danchin, Peter G. and Fischer, Horst, "United Nations Reform and the New Collective Security" - Reviewer: Graf-Brugère, Anne-Laurence Scharf, Michael P and Williams, Paul R., "Shaping Foreign Policy in Times of Crises; The Role of International Law and the State… [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:43 am
February 5, 2007Re: The Preternaturally Prolific Posner on Plagiarism.From: Dean Lawrence R. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 4:35 pm by Eugene Volokh
A minority of Pennsylvania's convention authored a report in which they contended that citizens have a right to bear arms "unless for crimes committed, or real danger of public injury. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:41 am by Eugene Volokh
A minority of Pennsylvania's convention authored a report in which they contended that citizens have a right to bear arms "unless for crimes committed, or real danger of public injury. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 7:08 am by Roel van Woudenberg
According to the case law of the Enlarged Board, a point of law is of fundamental importance if the answer to it goes beyond the individual case at issue and will be relevant in a potentially large number of cases (G 1/12, Reasons, point 11).2.1 In the Board's view it appears self-evident that the point of law addressed in the question below is of fundamental importance for an indefinite number of cases. [read post]