Search for: "IN RE IRWIN MINORS" Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2007, 10:24 am
City of Sault Ste-Marie [1978] 2 S.C.R. 1299 (strict liability offenses) Reference re a Resolution to amend the Constitution, [1981] 1 S.C.R. 753 (unwritten constitutional convention under which amendments to the Constitution require a substantial degree of provincial consent) For more background, I suggest reading Philip Girard's 2005 full-length biography of the man entitled Bora Laskin: Bringing Law to Life (Toronto : Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History): "In his first… [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Robert McKay
Perhaps the most significant news is of law publishing events in Canada, where Irwin Law and vLex have entered into a service agreement for hosting Irwin Law’s products on vLex, and a share purchase agreement, with vLex acquiring a minority shareholding in Irwin Law Inc. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 5:38 pm
The picture in Canada for racial minorities particularly those who are black remains grim. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
National Security Law, 2e Editors: Craig Forcese & Leah West ISBN: Print (Paperback): 9781552215517 Publisher: Irwin Law Page Count: 800 pages Publication Date: December 1, 2020 Regular Price: $75.00 Excerpt from pages 3–7; 23–29; 57–61 (citations omitted) Chapter 1: Scope This is a book about the law governing the Canadian state’s response to serious crises; that is, events that jeopardize its “national security. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Fundamental Law for Journalists Author: Mark Bourrie Publisher: Irwin Law Inc. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 7:10 am by Adam Schwartz
At the end of its 2019 session, the California Legislature enacted a package of minor amendments to the CCPA: A.B. 25 (Chau), A.B. 874 (Irwin), A.B. 1146 (Berman), A.B. 1355 (Chau), and A.B. 1564 (Berman). [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 5:23 am by SHG
But since it’s only surprising, it means only that they’re surprised. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 5:15 am by SHG
If what they’re doing is bad, then it’s bad when you do it as well. [read post]
27 May 2009, 4:09 pm
When Canadians re-gain their sensibility and re-examine the fairness and justice of these provisions, and the potential for abuse, it should be the first thing re-visited by Parliament. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:47 am by Simon Lester
In this regard, check out the great new Doug Irwin book Clashing over Commerce, and you will quickly see that most of the arguments we are having today were all being made hundreds of years ago. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 10:41 pm
As the Federal Circuit succinctly stated: ''Intellectual property rights do not confer a privilege to violate the antitrust laws.'' In re Indep. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 10:04 pm by Michael Geist
My submission: Re:  Trans Pacific Partnership Consultation I am a law professor at the University of Ottawa, Common Law Section where I hold the Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law. [read post]
9 May 2023, 1:20 pm by Patricia Hughes
Following Working Families I, the Ontario legislature had re-enacted the legislation with the inclusion of section 33 of the Charter, prompting the challenge under section 3. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 2:17 pm by Patricia Hughes
A day later, the government re-enacted the legislation with the notwithstanding clause. [read post]