Search for: "IN RE KUBIN"
Results 1 - 20
of 78
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2009, 9:55 pm
Noonan -- The Federal Circuit heard oral argument for In re Kubin last week, and a very hot bench (Judge Rader presiding, joined by Judges Linn and Friedman) sharply challenged the positions of both Kubin and the Patent Office. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 9:56 pm
The case, of course, raising these issues anew is In re Kubin, decided on Friday. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 7:14 am
which includes The Kubin decision had text about the CAFC decision In re Deuel:Appellants heavily rely on Deuel. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 1:29 pm
Many attended the arguments, including representatives from our office.Click below for more detail of the arguments in In re Kubin. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 9:38 pm
Noonan -- The Federal Circuit will hear oral argument on Thursday for In re Kubin, a case having great significance for biotechnology patenting. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 1:31 pm
By contrast, Patent Docs, pushing their particular subjective and outdated view of biotechnology patents, still doesn't get it, assigning multiple errors to the Federal Circuit court rather than trying to formulate a workable understanding of the rule now applied in In re Kubin and applicable to the grant or denial of all biotechnology patents in the future. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 9:05 am
The Human Genome is OURS not theirs: Gene Patents Should be Void on their Face Let us say, prior to our comments about In re Kubin, that we think that gene patents should be void and voided by legislation as a matter of public policy, including all gene patents thus far granted. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:39 am
The beginning of the post-->The Federal Circuit will hear oral argument on Thursday for In re Kubin, a case having great significance for biotechnology patenting. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 7:33 pm
Ex Parte Kubin (BPAI 2007) (Precedential) Kubin’s patent claims are directed to a cDNA molecule (NAIL) that serves as an NK cell surface marker. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 9:53 pm
By Donald Zuhn -- As we reported yesterday, the Federal Circuit heard oral argument today in In re Kubin (see "In re Kubin to Be Argued before the Federal Circuit on Thursday"). [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 2:14 pm
Today the Federal Circuit decided the appeal in In re Kubin, a case dealing with how the Supreme Court's KSR decision will apply in the field of biotechnology. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 2:22 pm
"The discussion by Albainy-Jenei is a good one, so be sure to read it, although we think that In re Kubin is not going to be long-term bad news for biotech or for the arts. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 4:50 am
Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in Ex parte Kubin (see Patent Docs post). [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 7:39 pm
Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. to Judge Rader's comment in the oral argument for In re Kubin. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 9:35 am
By Donald Zuhn -- This morning, the Federal Circuit issued decisions in both In re Kubin and Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 1:27 am
In re Kubin (Fed. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 2:12 am
The CAFC discussed the previous case of In re Deuel -->The instant case also requires this court to consider the Board's application of this court's early assessment of obviousness in the context of classical biotechnological inventions, specifically In re Deuel, 51 F.3d 1552 (Fed. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 9:19 pm
Noonan -- The recent discussion of the Federal Circuit's decision in the In re Kubin case suggests there may be some misunderstanding of the science behind the legal question of obviousness. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 9:52 pm
Noonan -- Biotechnology patent law faces the consequences of two decisions handed down last week by the Federal Circuit: In re Kubin and Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 9:05 am
Noonan -- The Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences recently got its long awaited opportunity to opine on the continued validity of the Federal Circuit's In re Deuel decision in light of the Supreme Court's recent decision in KSR Int'l Co. v. [read post]
