Search for: "IN RE MARRIAGE OF NOEL" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
In the Kansas case, In re Gardiner (2002), the state supreme court held that sex is fixed at birth, and that the marriage between a transgender female, J’Noel, and a man was invalid. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 5:07 am by Robin Shea
When you’re talking about opposite-sex couples, this is no big deal because a marriage validly entered into in one state will be always honored by the other states. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:28 am by Jon Hyman
— from Stephanie Thomas at Compensation CaféLabor Relations NLRB to Seek SCOTUS Review of Noel Canning — from Phil Miles’s Lawffice Space NLRB Lightens Grip on At-Will Language in Employer Handbooks — from The National Law ReviewThe RSS feed for this site has changed. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:13 am by Mark Walsh
Fridays are rare days for Supreme Court opinions, with the last one coming two years ago when the same-sex marriage ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:11 am by Amy Howe
At CNN, Bill Mears surveys the state of same-sex marriage laws, one year after the Court struck down the federal Defense of Marriage Act. [read post]
24 May 2015, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
After a week off, we're back with plenty of book reviews for the long weekend.From The New Rambler, there is a review of The Empire Trap: The Rise and Fall of U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 12:42 pm by familoo
Care, forced marriage and child abduction will not become means tested. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 11:29 am by Andrew Hamm
  And in an op-ed for National Review, Noel Francisco and Paul Pohl respond to a recent column by Linda Greenhouse, arguing that Greenhouse “paints a dramatically distorted picture of” the challenges. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 11:20 am by Stephen Bilkis
., In re Noel D. v Gladys D., 6 Misc 3d 1017(A) (Family Ct, Queens County, 2005)(NY temporary order granted under emergency jurisdiction of UCCJEA "modified" an Illinois temporary order of custody to father where marriage dissolved on default but court reserved decision on custody). [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 6:21 am by Marty Lederman
Notwithstanding the fact that the government has prevailed on the "substantial burden" question in almost all the courts of appeals, it has become increasingly evident over the past few months that that is the RFRA ground on which the government is least likely to prevail, in light of the plaintiffs' insistence that the government's arrangement with their insurers would make them complicit in their employees' use of contraceptives (or nonprocreative sex out of… [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For that matter, Justices Breyer, Kagan, and Sotomayor, as well as Justice Brown Jackson (while a federal judge), use those canons with increasing frequency in statutory interpretation cases as well.[17]Recognizing that fact, Justice Elena Kagan and a leading nontextualist scholar of statutory interpretation, Professor William Eskridge, have quipped, “[w]e’re all textualists now” (well, before walking that statement back in dissent to this past Term’s environmental… [read post]