Search for: "IN RE MEDIATEK"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2019, 5:59 am
MediaTek tried to, but wasn't nearly as effective during the public part of the testimony. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 8:00 am
Mediatek, Inc., 2007 WL 963975 (N.D. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 8:00 am
Mediatek, Inc., 2007 WL 963975 (N.D. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 10:33 am
Meanwhile, chipmaker MediaTek has also made a filing in support of the FTC's position. [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 8:43 am
As far as Huawei is concerned, they're actually not just a licensee, but also a rather aggressive licensor as their dispute with Samsung (pending in the same district) shows. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 7:37 pm
No. 10-CV-138), filed on March 1, 2010; (6) request for re-examination of the ‘455 patent filed by anonymous third party on April 29, 2011; and (7) infringement suit filed by Freescale against Zoran and MediaTek in the Western District of Texas (C.A. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 1:05 pm
Thus, other chipmakers—including Intel, MediaTek, Samsung, and others—have been free to make and sell modem chips, do so in increasing volumes, and pay no royalties to Qualcomm. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 3:12 pm
The efficient use of Commission resources Respondents advocated a stay as a means of conserving resources by avoiding the need to “re-do” portions of the investigation if they conflicted with the Federal Circuit opinions. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 2:11 am
And now that we're appproaching the end of the year, there isn't even room for debate: the Avanci model (through which Sisvel actually licenses its own patents to car makers) has been universally accepted. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 6:21 am
If you're interested in real-time information on this trial, please don't forget to follow me on Twitter.About a month ago, the parties filed their proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, which already constituted a preview of what we're going to see and, especially, hear this month. [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 8:16 am
Huawei and MediaTek could have complained, but Korean observers believe they aren't interested in that particular jurisdiction to the extent they'd take action there. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:31 pm
Such cases are common; they’re also notoriously challenging. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 8:48 am
Instead, Apple would use Intel and MediaTek components according to the report.Nothing is final yet, and Qualcomm says it could and would still sell its products to Apple. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 3:19 am
Even prior to the FTC formally giving up on that part, I had acknowledged that Qualcomm had credibly claimed never to have intended to grant exhaustive chipset-level licenses.This is an important landmark case, so I will spend some time in the weeks ahead re-reading the key documents and researching some of the theories in order to develop an opinion ahead of the hearing on what the outcome will be. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 11:40 pm
(order) (04/03/2007, non-precedential): suit involving claims of willful patent infringement and breach of several license agreements; petition for writ of mandamus for district court to issue protective order to conditionally stay defendant CEO's depositions; denial of a motion seeking protective order that lower-level employees could be interrogated instead of the CEOs because the CEOs "did not possess any unique knowledge to this matter"; regional circuit law applies regarding the… [read post]
17 Aug 2019, 2:07 am
Imagine you're a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and from time to time you serve on the Motions Panel that changes every month. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 11:12 am
We're not even talking about the Supreme Court deciding to overrule an earlier decision. [read post]
17 May 2017, 10:36 am
Apple is now embroiled in a particularly intense and escalating fight with Qualcomm, and there may be reasons for which they're particularly proactive, though Samsung isn't just sitting by idly. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 12:46 pm
According to the motion, "[t]he witnesses who testified at these hearings included representatives from Samsung, Intel, Motorola, MediaTek and Huawei, among other companies. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 9:54 am
In re MediaTek, Inc., 2007 WL 1046900 (Fed.Cir.2007). [read post]
