Search for: "IN RE NICHOLE SINES MINOR" Results 1 - 2 of 2
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2015, 6:34 am by Alex Bailin QC, Matrix
He was bolstered in that conclusion by the fact that neither Lord Nicholls nor Lord Hope in Campbell considered REP to be a sine qua non of private life engagement and that Campbell was a breach of confidence case anyway (in which expectation is more relevant). [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
  He was bolstered in that conclusion by the fact that neither Lord Nicholls or Lord Hope in Campbell considered REP to be a sine qua non of private life engagement and that Campbell was a breach of confidence case anyway (in which expectation is more relevant). [read post]