Search for: "IN RE OMEGA SA"
Results 1 - 20
of 32
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2007, 4:41 am
Omega SA v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 5:00 am
Photo by ELEVATE on Pexels.com Earlier this year, a jury in New York federal court returned a verdict of $1.1 million in favor of Omega SA and its parents Swatch SA. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 4:45 am
Omega SA that original, copyrighted works legitimately purchased overseas cannot be imported into the United States and re-sold here under the first sale doctrine of U.S. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 10:12 am
Omega SA opposed this application unsuccessfully and then appealed to the High Court. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 5:05 am
" In re Omega SA, Appeal No. 2006-1234 (Fed. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 2:54 pm
Here's just a quick note on Monday's US Supreme Court ruling in Costco Wholesale Corp v Omega SA, which ended in a 4-4 draw (Justice Kagan sat this one out). [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 1:04 am
Last Monday the US Supreme Court granted the writ of certiorari in the Costco Wholesale Corp v Omega SA case. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:34 am
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.January 14, 2015- 2 PM: Omega SA v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 8:20 am
" In re Omega SA, 494 F.3d 1362, 83 USPQ2d 1541, 1544 (Fed. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 12:59 pm
The case under review arose from a suit by the Omega, SA, manufacturer of the well known watch by that name, against Costco Wholesale Corp. to block sales of genuine Omega watches manufactured in Switzerland, sold abroad and then shipped in the gray market to resellers in the US who sold them to Costco. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 1:05 pm
* C-70/10, Scarlet Extended SA v. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 12:33 pm
More on In re Omega SA after the jump. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 8:19 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) K (Children), Re [2012] EWCA Civ 1549 (29 November 2012) Alfa Laval Tumba AB & Anor v Separator Spares International Ltd & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 1569 (29 November 2012) Birmingham City Council v Ashton [2012] EWCA Civ 1557 (29 November 2012) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Ligaya Nursing v R [2012] EWCA Crim 2521 (30 November 2012) Ravjani & Ors, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2519 (29 November 2012) Shabir, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2564 (29 November 2012)… [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 3:09 am
The Board noted that applicant was not required to disclaim FURNITURE WAREHOUSE in its prior registrations, but that was irrelevant:While we recognize that “consistency is highly desirable,” In re Omega SA, 494 F.3d 1362, 83 USPQ2d 1541, 1544 (Fed. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 3:33 am
” See In re Omega SA, 494 F.3d 1362, 83 USPQ2d 1541, 1544 (Fed. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 4:51 am
— from Human Resource Executive OnlinePhoto credit: RustyTheDog (Own work) [CC-BY-SA-3.0 or GFDL], via Wikimedia Commons The RSS feed for this site has changed. [read post]
7 May 2020, 5:14 am
Furniture Warehouse Co., 126 USPQ2d 1400, 1407 (TTAB 2018) (quoting In re Omega SA, 494 F.3d 1362, 83 USPQ2d 1541, 1544 (Fed. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
Though I haven’t indicated which is which, I will note that, before Quality King, courts were split on whether the first sale doctrine applied to goods first manufactued in the US and then re-imported without authorization. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
Though I haven’t indicated which is which, I will note that, before Quality King, courts were split on whether the first sale doctrine applied to goods first manufactued in the US and then re-imported without authorization. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
: In re Bollore (TTABlog) [read post]
