Search for: "IN RE PRICE MINORS"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,711
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2009, 3:44 am
If you're in a bookstore, for instance, and hold up a copy of Learning the Vi and Vim Editors, SixthSense shows you pricing guides, information about the author, and so on. [read post]
31 May 2008, 12:59 pm
However, when you buy publicly traded stock, you know that, at the very least, you're not captive--you can sell your stocks on the open market for whatever price it will bring. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 5:13 am
They’re politically well-connected. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 5:00 am
In Re John Q Hammons Hotels Inc. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 7:11 am
The court also rejected the alternative argument that Liberty, as a minority but still-controlling stockholder, had a fiduciary duty not to enter into open market purchases without negotiating with the Sirius board. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 6:53 am
Second, if you’re a trusts and estates lawyer sooner or later you’re going to have to deal with a dispute involving minors. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 1:19 am
The Court’s Decision We know instantly we’re in new territory when we read the opening sentence of Erie County Supreme Court Justice Henry J. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 11:23 am
Imagine you’re hiring a contractor to build a deck. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 4:00 am
If you're the controlling owner of a New York closely held business, and you're thinking about buying out a minority partner, here's my two cents: Don't do it, unless (a) you have zero intention of selling the company for at least several years, or (b) if you are contemplating a short-term sale of the company, you have a strong stomach for litigation and prior to the buyout you turn over to the minority… [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 6:05 am
Even if the government runs more like a majority than a minority (which certainly seems likely on digital policy as no one is forcing an election over privacy or wireless pricing), the same ministers return to their portfolios (which may or may not happen) and the same committee structures return largely unchanged (which will not happen since that INDU chair Dan Ruimy was not re-elected), picking up where the government left off in June will not be easy. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 7:16 am
Prior to 2013, merger freezeouts were invariably subject to entire fairness review, a demanding standard of judicial review that permits a judicial revision of the price paid to the target shareholders when the price is challenged. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 11:54 am
See In Re El Paso, summarized here, and In Re Micromet, summarized here. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:27 am
Fifth, any conflicts were minor and were fully disclosed. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 5:15 am
In re Finisar Corp., 2008 U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 8:59 am
But we’re not all great at service. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 6:00 am
In re Terraform Power, Inc. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 6:44 am
" Reverse redlining, by contrast, steers minority buyers into higher-priced loans and neighborhoods considered appropriate for their racial backgrounds. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 1:55 pm
They had three children, but only one of them is still a minor. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 1:41 pm
Those minority shareholders claimed the price at which Promega wanted to buy back their shares was deeply discounted, and when they tried to negotiate for a higher price point, Promega allegedly refused, which ultimately led to the massive lawsuit between the company and its minority shareholders that dragged on for about five years. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 12:48 pm
We’re not done yet. [read post]
