Search for: "IN RE RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT FOR MANDATORY CONTINUING LEGAL EDUC" Results 21 - 40 of 161
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2023, 1:19 pm by Howard Knopf
Interestingly, there have been a lot of withdrawn tariffs – perhaps somehow arising from the Supreme Court’s ruling that Board tariffs are not legally mandatory for users. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 5:18 am by Michael Geist
The Supreme Court did it again in 2021, rejecting Access Copyright’s mistaken theory that its tariff is mandatory and identifying multiple errors in lower court rulings involving the fair dealing analysis of copying at York University. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 12:49 pm by Howard Knopf
The SCC clearly ruled that: Access Copyright’s tariff as approved by the Copyright Board is not mandatory for users It was unnecessary and inappropriate for the Courts below to issue a declaration about fair dealing in these circumstances Nonetheless, there were serious errors in the Courts below noted concerning their pronouncements about fair dealing, e.g. re “aggregate” copying. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:30 am by Emma Snell
He faces a mandatory life sentence. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 12:30 pm by Mark J. Levin and John L. Culhane, Jr.
Supreme Court held that in order for another federal statute to override the FAA, the other statute must “manifest a clear intention to displace” the FAA. [read post]
Isn’t it harmful to the Court and the nation when rulings on prominent constitutional issues swing back and forth with the election of new presidents and the appointment of new Supreme Court Justices? [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:57 pm by John Ross
The opinion from the Tennessee Supreme Court reverses the Court of Appeals and vacates the Chancery Court's 2020 ruling that held the program violated the Tennessee Constitution's Home Rule Amendment. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 9:02 pm by Sam Wong
Velte, professor at the University of Kansas School of Law, argued that a mandatory continuing legal education requirement for attorneys that focuses on diversity, equity, and inclusion helps prevent anti-LGBTQ+ bias in the legal profession. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Although the trial court has not yet ruled on the merits of the challenge, it issued the restraining order based on the conclusion that there is a substantial likelihood the law will be found unconstitutional. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 4:22 am by SHG
(See this earlier post on this year’s Supreme Court conflicts case.) [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
WadeAbortion rights turn on the Supreme Court’s pending decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The post Florida Supreme Court Reaffirms Rejection of Identity-Based Quotas for Continuing Legal Education Programs appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm by admin
Supreme Court General Electric Co. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 2:05 pm by John Ross
The American Board of Medical Specialties is the nonprofit that decides which physicians are "Board Certified," a credential that requires annual continuing education. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 6:59 am by Michael Geist
That continues with the response to last week’s Supreme Court of Canada decision. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm by Howard Knopf
  “Veni, vidi, vici”: Julius Caesar, 47 BC The more than ten-year-old effort by Access Copyright (“AC”) to impose a “mandatory tariff” through the Copyright Board on Canadian educational institutions is over in a quick, decisive, and devastating unanimous judgment from Justice Rosalie Abellaof the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”). 85 years of legislative policy and SCC jurisprudence are re-affirmed,… [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am by Philip Bobbitt
  Let us track his rationale as follows: The removal penalty in Article II, though mandatory, is merely appurtenant to the powers of impeachment, trial and conviction provided the houses of Congress in Article I. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 8:30 pm by Jim Sedor
But there is nothing explicitly mandatory in the compromise text. [read post]