Search for: "IN RE RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT FOR MANDATORY CONTINUING LEGAL EDUC."
Results 1 - 20
of 163
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2012, 7:11 am
Some call it Minimum Continuing Legal Education while others label it Mandatory Continuing Legal Education. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
The post Florida Supreme Court Reaffirms Rejection of Identity-Based Quotas for Continuing Legal Education Programs appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 12:30 pm
Supreme Court held that in order for another federal statute to override the FAA, the other statute must “manifest a clear intention to displace” the FAA. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 7:14 am
The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia granted a request from the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education Commission for a temporary waiver of current CLE rules and regulations which limit the CLE credits for online and in-house credits to 12 credits, or half of the mandatory continuing legal education requirements. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 8:11 am
The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia granted a request from the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education Commission for a temporary waiver of current CLE rules and regulations which limit the CLE credits for online and in-house credits to 12 credits, or half of the mandatory continuing legal education requirements. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 7:07 pm
Continuing legal education is fungible. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 5:18 am
The Supreme Court did it again in 2021, rejecting Access Copyright’s mistaken theory that its tariff is mandatory and identifying multiple errors in lower court rulings involving the fair dealing analysis of copying at York University. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 8:31 am
” Patrick Colligan, president of the New Jersey State Policemen’s Benevolent Association, said the benefits of membership, such as legal protection, give him confidence a ruling against mandatory membership dues wouldn’t devastate the organization. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 6:59 am
That continues with the response to last week’s Supreme Court of Canada decision. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm
“Veni, vidi, vici”: Julius Caesar, 47 BC The more than ten-year-old effort by Access Copyright (“AC”) to impose a “mandatory tariff” through the Copyright Board on Canadian educational institutions is over in a quick, decisive, and devastating unanimous judgment from Justice Rosalie Abellaof the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”). 85 years of legislative policy and SCC jurisprudence are re-affirmed,… [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 4:22 am
(See this earlier post on this year’s Supreme Court conflicts case.) [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
I try to address briefly almost all of the significant areas of current controversy that continue to arise in the Court’s docket. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 12:42 pm
Supreme Court has agreed to review Friedrichs apparently to re-consider this 1977 Abood decision. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 10:08 am
I don't love continuing legal education classes. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
We at the Supreme Court mourn the loss of a beloved colleague, a fiercely independent defender of the rule of law, and an eloquent advocate for civics education. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 3:33 pm
Detroit Board of Education (1977). [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 9:11 am
Sanchez noted that Palomo had briefly claimed an exemption from mandatory continuing legal education (MCLE) requirements. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:43 am
Alabama, we see both the clear continuation of a trend on the Court -- and the passing of a torch. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:24 pm
This is because there are two underlying goals—private study and education—that cover all the copying that takes place in the educational context.[426] With respect to amount of the dealing factor, and as explained above in Part XIII.F above, we apply the following rule. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 7:25 am
Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in Janus v. [read post]
