Search for: "IN RE S L GARLAND MINOR" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Clinton re-nominated Garland in January 1997, and he was confirmed approximately three months later by a vote of 76-23. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:33 am by Emma Snell
  Mexico’s president Andrés Manuel López Obrador said yesterday that his country is more democratic that the U.S.. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The proffer of a quite novel reason not to consider the Garland nomination, combined with a complete failure to apply the reasoning to a situation in which logically it applies a fortiori, has created widespread concern that the confirmation process was abused. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 9:03 pm by Sam Wong
Clark and Heather L. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 2:07 pm by Adam Feldman
However, given Chief Judge Merrick Garlands unsuccessful nomination, Ginsburg’s decision seems more justifiable because the confirmation of a successor appointed by Obama might not have been guaranteed. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:15 pm by Alan Z. Rozenshtein
If you’re trying to answer the question, “Is Trump policy X evidence of authoritarianism? [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 6:01 am by Joshua Braver
… If that’s what radical means, call me a radical. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
Defendants accused (perhaps wrongly) of serious misconduct Many defendants could be ruined simply by being publicly accused of certain offenses (rape, sexual harassment, embezzlement, fraud, malpractice, and the like)—or can be materially harmed even by being sued for more minor matters, such as in landlords' unlawful detainer actions against tenants. [1] Even if they know they're innocent, they might agree to settle as a means of avoiding the lawsuit even being… [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
Despite the Supreme Court's 1976 ruling in Gregg v. [read post]