Search for: "IN RE THE ISSUANCE OF ORDERS MANDATING CASES"
Results 1 - 20
of 258
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2018, 9:08 am
The court could mandate the no-contact order as part of the companion case to avoid further problems going forward. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:12 am
When the Circuit Court issued its ruling on March 26, it simultaneously issued an order withholding the implementing order — that is, the mandate — until seven days after any party sought re-hearing. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
The mandate obviously includes determining what education is required for issuance of a license to practise law. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 4:07 pm
Rule 5-3 relates to the issuance of a stay of a mandate (or the recall of a mandate) when a petition for writ of certiorari is filed at the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 1:38 pm
The Austrian Supreme Court referred the case to the CJEU, asking whether orders to block “identical” or “equivalent” content were permissible under Article 15 of the eCommerce Directive. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 6:23 am
Having considered these briefs, the Court reaffirmed its initial stay and ordered that “OSHA cannot take any steps to implement or enforce the Mandate until further court order. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 6:23 am
Having considered these briefs, the Court reaffirmed its initial stay and ordered that “OSHA cannot take any steps to implement or enforce the Mandate until further court order. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
The text of the case follows. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 9:07 am
Finally, the Biden administration should use the issuance of the order as an opportunity to eliminate the accountability by committee that PPD-41 established (via the Cyber Response Group). [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 9:31 pm
The previous stay of the mandate is lifted. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 7:40 am
In re Stallings, 318 N.C. 565 (1986). [read post]
23 May 2024, 4:54 pm
Following supplemental briefing on these issues, and on whether discharge was precluded because only part of the original project was re-approved, the trial court discharged the writ in December 2023, and STC appealed that discharge order. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 11:49 am
The Texas Supreme Court’s order did not specify whether that time period would begin on the issuance of its opinion, on the issuance of its mandate, or by rule from the water district. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 2:57 pm
[citation omitted] [t]he trial court’s limited writ of mandate in this case did not require the court to revisit issues other than traffic impacts. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 10:25 am
Specifically, Hornbeck argued that the DOI’s rescission and re-issuance of the moratorium disobeyed the court’s order enjoining enforcement of the initial moratorium. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 3:48 am
If the trial court finds that the exception applies, it can re-enter the conviction and sentences, and if not, it can order suppression… A forfeiture specification is not necessary to allow forfeiture of $11,000 in a drug case, the 9th District rules in State v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 5:01 am
In 2006, Congress mandated (in 18 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 10:25 am
Specifically, Hornbeck argued that the DOI’s rescission and re-issuance of the moratorium disobeyed the court’s order enjoining enforcement of the initial moratorium. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:37 pm
Mandamus Standard The standard for the issuance of a writ of mandamus is well established. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:37 pm
Mandamus Standard The standard for the issuance of a writ of mandamus is well established. [read post]
