Search for: "IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF WALKER"
Results 1 - 20
of 166
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2011, 5:22 pm
Any reviewing court has to ask whether the facts warranted recusal, absent waiver, if allowed, and so we're back to the threshold questions: Does Walker want to marry in California? [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 7:47 am
Walker's response: “If that happened it would be great, but we’re not the party of silos,” said Walker of having a minority carry the GOP banner. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 1:11 pm
I will not join the fray here on that question (although it seems hard for Prop 8 proponents to argue irreparable harm if the order is not stayed, since Californians have been living with the thousands of civil marriages by same-sex couples, entered into the several month interim between the California Supreme Court’s In re Marriage Cases ruling and voter approval of Prop. 8). [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 11:40 am
Only 42 per cent say we’re on the wrong track. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 3:53 am
Sometimes it is difficult to assess social and policy change while you’re in the middle of it. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 11:44 am
Small, 352 S.W.3d at 284; see, e.g., In re Estate of Walker, No. 02-08-00371-CV, 2009 WL 1996301, at *4 (Tex. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 6:35 am
Bush – who had pushed earlier for a Federal Marriage Amendment (FMA) that would have banned same-sex marriage – was seeking re-election. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
And if you’re Reinhardt, make the opinion “per curiam” so it doesn’t come to the Court with your name on it. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 8:16 am
And Judge Walker, based on “[t]he evidence at trial,” found “that marriage in the United States traditionally has not been open to same-sex couples. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 4:22 pm
Walker did not have the capacity to enter the Marriage, the Marriage is void ab initio. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
[Reuters] * You're not worth $160,000. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:41 pm
Walker—was heard with its equivalent from Indiana—Baskin v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 8:17 am
Yesterday afternoon, federal district court judge Vaughn Walker declined to stay his decision invalidating California’s ban on same-sex marriage, re-igniting speculation that the issue will soon come before the Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
Walker, has high-powered lawyers seeking far-reaching relief for the rights of (gay) individuals. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
Walker, has high-powered lawyers seeking far-reaching relief for the rights of (gay) individuals. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 9:31 am
Yesterday afternoon ProtectMarriage (a supporter of the California ban on gay marriage) moved to have Judge Vaughn Walker’s ruling set aside because Walker is gay. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:20 pm
On April 13, 2011, marriage equality opponents filed a motion in the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 1:52 pm
Now, let's say you're a judge on the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 6:34 am
Perry was about Judge Walker’s decision to strike down Proposition 8, a California ballot initiative that denied access to marriage to same-sex couples. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 11:26 am
And Circuit Courts are institutionally conservative; they’re not supposed to go farther than they need to, and they tend not to. [read post]
