Search for: "IN RE THOMAS MINORS"
Results 201 - 220
of 931
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
In most cases, the office decided the violation was minor enough to merit only a warning letter. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 3:47 am
Also let me remind you of what Thurgood Thurgood Marshall said as he was retiring from the Court, before Clarence Thomas was nominated:Q: Do you think President Bush has any kind of an obligation to name a minority justice in your place? [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
For the Symposium on Jack M. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
’ Now They’re Better at It Than the GOP. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 10:03 am
The panel will feature Thomas Hegghammer, senior research fellow at the Norwegian Defense Research Establishment; Tricia Bacon, assistant professor at American University and Bruce Riedel, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. [read post]
5 Sep 2020, 8:44 am
The Times ran a review by barrister and legal author Thomas Grant QC, which told us oh-so-eloquently why this book was bloody brilliant : The SB is an accomplished writer who through vivid metaphor can enliven the most recondite legal concepts. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 9:56 am
In In re Marriage of Candiotti (1995) 34 Cal. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
Lengthy dissents and concurrences form Justices Thomas and Alito suggest deep fissures in the conservative camp that render Tushnet’s account of the Roberts Court’s master strategy less persuasive. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am
His goal – which I share – is to foster a genuinely pluralistic left, capable of sympathetic – or teeth-gritting – cohabitation with religious minorities, and to frame and justify a rule permitting narrow and burdened exemptions. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
By William Abbott, Diane Kindermann, Glen Hansen, and Daniel Cucchi Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann, Inc. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 12:11 pm
Justice Thomas would have granted the petition in Price. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
In a report for the Center for Progressive Reform, law professors Thomas O. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm
Justice Clarence Thomas dissented because he found no legal authority for the SEC to seize profits and feared that the process would encourage abuse. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
For a President who is a longstanding proponent of capital punishment and is gearing up to run a law-and-order re-election campaign, Attorney General William Barr’s June 15 order to resume federal executions was a gift. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 2:22 pm
When you guys put somebody in the [police] car and you’re protecting their head, you know, the way you put their hand over, like, don’t hit their head and they’ve just killed somebody. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 9:14 am
"] From In re Marriage of Kelly & Kelly, decided Friday by the Appellate Court of Illinois, and written by Justice Mathias Delort, joined by Justices Thomas Hoffman and Mary Rochford (nonprecedential): [A Chicago public radio station operator and the Chicago Tribune Co.] filed a joint motion to intervene in divorce proceedings between petitioner-appellee Robert Kelly and respondent-appellee Andrea Kelly. [read post]
29 May 2020, 3:00 am
For more information see:https://www.epa.gov/wotus-rulehttps://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/420308-epa-to-re-write-definition-to-shrink-pollution-protections-onhttps://www.politico.com/newsletters/morning-energy/2018/12/11/its-wotus-day-449593https://www.natlawreview.com/article/long-awaited-wotus-rule-addresses-uncertainty-may-face-litigation-aheadhttps://www.feedstuffs.com/news/epa-proposes-new-wotus-rule 2. [read post]
28 May 2020, 8:23 am
Last month, Facebook closed a $5.7 billion deal for a minority stake in Indian telecom startup Reliance Jio, giving the social media giant a larger foothold in the region. [read post]
26 May 2020, 11:25 am
If we’re lucky en [read post]
26 May 2020, 10:29 am
Even this lone case is weak authority, not only because it comes from a minor court [conducted by the Mayor, who had never been a jurist], but also because it did not involve a statute, and the same result might possibly have been achieved (without invoking constitutional entitlement) by the court's simply modifying the common-law rules of evidence to recognize such a privilege. [read post]
