Search for: "IN RE THOMAS MINORS" Results 261 - 280 of 933
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2023, 10:35 am by Eric Goldman
” This means we’re going to get a textualist interpretation, accurate or not, but also we’re going to get policy and “living” text arguments because…why not? [read post]
16 May 2008, 9:08 pm
She also pointed out that Alexander was convicted of a sex offense against a minor, whereas Tarpley's earlier victim was an adult. ..more.. by Thomas W. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 7:00 pm
" In re Thermo LabSystems Inc., Serial No. 78204502 (March 15, 2007) [precedential].James Dewey WatsonExamining Attorney Doritt Carroll established a prima facie case that the primary significance of WATSON to purchasers is merely that of a surname. [read post]
19 May 2010, 5:00 am by Broc Romanek
Here's SA 4056 and its record from the Thomas (Library of Congress) website. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 1:54 pm
Thomas of Pacific Legal Foundation told the Advertiser. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 6:00 am by An Hertogen
Chelvan, Sabine Jansen, Jenni Millbank and Thomas Spijkerboer. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 6:53 am by Daniel Shaviro
The reason (no surprise here, but worth saying in a big-megaphone forum like the NYT): they're unaffordable over the long run, but the recession makes this a bad time to let them expire. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:44 pm by Elie Mystal
We’re minorities and we test well, shouldn’t we always get in everywhere? [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 3:49 am by Russ Bensing
Except they’re not absolute. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 6:00 am by Michael Froomkin
Frankly, we’re dismayed that more faculty, staff and students have not strongly vocalized opposition to this hire. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 3:32 am by NCC Staff
Clarence Thomas was 43 years old when he was confirmed for the Supreme Court in 1991. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm by Melanie Fontes
In an apparent attempt to reverse the rogue decision, the majority of active judges on the Ninth Circuit authorized en banc review.[3]  But because the Ninth Circuit has so many judges, it alone among the federal appellate courts employs a limited en banc review, where only eleven of its active judges sit en banc, consisting of the chief judge and ten other active judges who are randomly selected.[4] Accordingly, limited en banc allows for “minority rule” in a subset of… [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:39 am by Lovechilde
Scalia, Alito, Thomas, and Roberts (and, all too often, Kennedy) claim they’re conservative jurists. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 1:31 pm by NCC Staff
(Two Justices, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas, asked no questions during arguments.) [read post]