Search for: "IN RE UNITED SCAFFOLDING, INC." Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2011, 10:52 am by Sean Wajert
The entire unit is mobile: it has four wheels that may be locked while the user is working and unlocked when moving the unit. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 7:53 am by Don Cruse
WOOD COUNTY ENERGY, LLC; WOOD COUNTY OIL & GAS, LTD.; NELSON OPERATING..., No. 10-0887 a solo concurring opinion in IN RE UNITED SCAFFOLDING, INC., No. 10-0526 The Court’s public calendar is light over the next couple of weeks. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 10:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Food and Drug Administration has announced that an orthopedic device used in the knee should not have been cleared for marketing in the United States. [read post]
Guzman delivered the opinion of the Court.UNDER NEW PRECEDENT CREATED IN 2009, TRIAL COURTS ARE NOT ALLOWED TO GRANT NEW TRIAL FOLLOWING JURY VERDICT MERELY "IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE" - ANOTHER JUDGE GETS MANDAMUSSED ACCORDINGLYIn re United Scaffolding, Inc., No. 09-0403 (Tex. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 7:54 am by Don Cruse
Rogelio Casados and Rafaela Casados, No. 10-0523 In re United Scaffolding, Inc., No. 10-0526 Rusk State Hospital v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 8:18 am by Don Cruse
Legal Newsline reports: “Texas SC orders judge to clarify why he disregarded verdict” about IN RE UNITED SCAFFOLDING, INC., No. 10-0526 The Texas Tribune writes: “Texas Sees Rising Tide of Property-Rights Cases”, which while discussing larger trends, mentions “four decisions on land-use issues” from August 31, as well as TEXAS RICE LAND PARTNERS, LTD. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:00 am by Don Cruse
” IN RE UNITED SCAFFOLDING, INC., No. 10-0526 Opinion of the Court Concurring This might have been the case that resolved how detailed the trial court must be in granting a motion for new trial. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 8:46 am by Don Cruse
Another application of Columbia Medical Center, requiring trial courts to specify their reasons for granting new trial of a jury verdict In re United Scaffolding, Inc., No. 09? [read post]