Search for: "IN RE WOOTEN MINORS" Results 1 - 9 of 9
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm
  For the last several years, and with no particular purpose other than a desire to meander through reflection, I have taken the period between Christmas and New Years Eve to produce a s summary of the slice of the year to which I paid attention through epigrams and aphorisms. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 1:43 pm by Hunter Biederman
Wooten's win was attributed to her opposition's use of a controversial drug to fix drug use. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 3:07 pm
"They're both in outstanding health for people of their age. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm by Mandelman
  For example, in the case of In re: Lopez, No. 09-10346, 2011 WL 576820 (Bankr. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Apr. 1, 2009)(Unpub)Affirming sex harass award of $466K+ and $291K atty feesDC Circuit In Re: DC Water And Sewer Authority, No. 08-7099 (D.C. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 9:59 am by Eric Turkewitz
I’m here today to take issue with both points before turning this blog (hopefully) back toward the personal injury field that is my bailiwick… John Stossel, You Gotta Love Him (2/3/10): Now I know what you’re thinking with this headline: “John Stossel? [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Brattain, No. 07-1594 A sentence for aggravated sexual abuse of a minor is vacated and remanded for resentencing where, contrary to the district court's conclusion, the district court's refusal to apply an enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. section 4B1.5(b) was error because defendant qualified as a repeat offender, and Congress explicitly revised the enhancement to apply to repeat-offenders who abuse only a single victim. [read post]