Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: E. E. B. W." Results 1 - 20 of 1,721
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2024, 7:15 am by Telecommunications Practice Group
§ 254(d) that would require federal Universal Service Fund contributions by ISPs: “[W]e believe that any decisions on whether and how to make BIAS providers contribute to USF funding are best addressed holistically in [] ongoing discussions of USF contribution reform, on a full record and with robust input from all interested parties, than in this proceeding. [read post]
10 May 2024, 7:09 am by The Murray Law Firm
 Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888-842-1616. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:20 am by Eugene Volokh
[W]e hold the district court committed legal error by understating the woman's interest in anonymity, appearing to announce a general rule that fairness considerations invariably cut against allowing a plaintiff to be anonymous at trial unless the defendant is also anonymous, and failing to recognize the significance of its default judgment on liability…. [read post]
3 May 2024, 9:05 pm by Julia Englebert
Foreign adversaries could use TPLF to conduct economic espionage and theft, threating U.S. national security interests, Michael E. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am by Eugene Volokh
[W]e hold the district court committed legal error by understating the woman's interest in anonymity, appearing to announce a general rule that fairness considerations invariably cut against allowing a plaintiff to be anonymous at trial unless the defendant is also anonymous, and failing to recognize the significance of its default judgment on liability…. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 7:58 am by Richard West
This includes pay stubs, W-2 forms, or any other evidence of income you have received in the past six months. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1]  Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3]  One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
My thinking, from my e-mail to the PolitiFact writer (which was largely quoted in the post): [1.] [read post]
Justice Alito admitted as much: ”[W]e didn’t really take this case just to decide whether this particular case was correctly decided. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 7:22 am by Mavrick Law Firm
  The Supreme Court’s Ruckelhaus precedent explained that, “[w]ith respect to a trade secret, the right to exclude others is central to the very definition of the property interest. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:22 am by Peter Mahler
, to receive distributions as provided in subsection (b), and, if the company dissolves and winds up, to receive specified information pertaining to the company from the date of dissolution as provided in subsection (c). . . . [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
However, following self-interest does not automatically yield socially positive results when not channeled into productive work and investments that predictably redound to collective well-being. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 9:44 am by Russell Knight
” 735 ILCS 5/2-1301(e) After 30 days of the marital settlement’s entry, the court must hear certain proofs. [read post]