Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: L.J. , A CHILD"
Results 1 - 20
of 76
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2007, 2:10 pm
L.J. 1029 (2007)). [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:28 pm
L.J. 499, 520-37 (2005) (describing the Michaels solution for suggestive interviewing techniques and expanding on it). [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Sawyer, State and Religion: The French Response to Jihadist Violence, (Religions 14, no. 8: 1010, 2023).Jose Ryan Pelongco, Promoting Equality in the Workplace: Debunking the Heteronormative Assumption Applied to Philippine Legislation,((66 Ateneo L.J. 1411 (2022)).Matthew Cavedon, Las Casas’s Use of Legal Interpretive Rules at Valladolid, (August 11, 2023).Nathan Ristuccia, Penitent Privilege in the Age of Abrogation, (Mississippi Law Journal Online, 2023).Lisa Spagnolo &… [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 5:06 pm
L.J. 1571 (1996); Edward J. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 11:54 am
[Spencer & Zammit, supra, 1976 Duke L.J. at 918-19.] [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 8:12 am
Mosteller, Child Abuse Reporting Law and Attorney-Client Confidences: the Reality and the Specter of Lawyer as Informant, 42 Duke L.J. 203, 269 (1992). [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 7:37 am
Rev. 395 (1997) (PDF) Patrice Kunesh-Hartman, The Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978: Protecting Essential Tribal Interests, 60 U. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 4:05 am
Postema (Hart Publishing, 2020)).Marc Spindelman, Justice Gorsuch's Choice: From Bostock to Dobbs (What a Blockbuster LGBT Rights Ruling Might Mean for the Future of Abortion Rights), (Nat'l L.J. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 4:05 am
Lytton, Tort Claims for the Coverup of Child Sexual Abuse: Private Litigation, Corporate Accountability, and Institutional Reform, (DePaul Law Review, Vol. 72, No. 2, 2023).Sahar F. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 6:02 am
Simons, Giving Vulnerable Students Their Due: Implementing Due Process Protections for Students Referred from Schools to the Justice System, 66 Duke L.J. 943 (2017). [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
But the actual development of governance since the New Deal has changed federal-state relations in ways that do not map onto these debates particularly well.The standard model assumes that centralization of power best serves national interests, while decentralization and devolution benefit the states and local interests. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 1:17 pm
Dowd, Fathers and the Supreme Court: Founding Fathers and Nurturing Fathers, 54 EMORY L.J. 1271 (2005). [read post]
3 May 2011, 6:43 am
L.J., the mother of the Mother in Mark T. vs. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 7:30 am
L.J. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 12:03 pm
Patterson further cites a law review article, Kansas Child Support Guidelines: An Elusive Search for Fairness in Support Orders, 27 Washburn L.J. 104 (1987), that captures the tensions between these two competing child support philosophies: A final question that caused considerable debate was whether there should be a cap on the schedule. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 12:05 pm
L.J. 1165-1235 (2012). [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 8:22 pm
I recently came across an interesting article on that subject which prompted this post. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 4:00 pm
L.J., Father, who had primary custody of Child, requested to move Washington state with the Child because he was marrying a Washington state resident. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:44 pm
Today, in New Doe Child #1 v. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 11:20 am
Dowd, Fathers and the Supreme Court: Founding Fathers and Nurturing Fathers, 54 EMORY L.J. 1271 (2005). [read post]
