Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF A.L., Minor Child, A.L., Father, Appellant." Results 1 - 2 of 2
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The agency interviewed a five-year-old child of A.L., the newborn’s father (T.D.), and A.L. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
But because the record did not reflect the existence of any similar significant public interest that required the disclosure of Father D's name, the court held that Father D's name must be redacted from any discovery documents that were released. [read post]