Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF E. M., CHILD (FATHER)"
Results 21 - 40
of 217
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2007, 4:37 am
The purpose of the registry shall be to record contact information for a man who wants to voluntarily claim that he may have fathered a child to whom he may claim paternity and that he wants to be notified in the event of an action for leave to adopt the child. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
Conclusory and nonspecific allegations relating to a change in circumstances are insufficient to justify a hearing on the issue of whether a change in custody would be in the best interests of the child. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 5:40 am
The father appeared with counsel and the mother appeared pro se. the Support Magistrate, inter alia, in effect, granted the father’s petition and directed the mother to pay child support of $319.32 bi-weekly. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 12:00 am
Until then, though, the determination of visitation rights is a matter for state courts, and though the mother understandably doesn’t want to even be involved in litigation with the father, I think that will be found not to be an adequate grounds for federal courts’ blocking the state proceedings. [1] Note that custody can be denied to one parent in favor of another parent under a lower standard than the one discussed above: a judgment by a preponderance of the evidence that the… [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:42 am
One child was born of the marriage, and the primary issue in the case involved custody of the parties' minor child. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
’s denial of paternity since “[h]e never definitively took steps to dissuade the child or anyone else that he was NOT the father. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 4:03 pm
Sadly, Father has squandered many opportunities to reach out to this child such as when he blurted out "I'm not going to take this f***ing shit anymore" in front of her. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:00 am
“When it comes to child arrangements,” she said, “we typically communicate via e-mail. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am
The First Department declined to follow the interpretation of the Second Department which held that the ICPC applies to a nonrespondent parent living outside of New York (Matter of Alexus M. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm
V Dean E. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
April 16, 2019Appellate Division, Second Department Appellate Division holds that Indian Child Welfare Act applies to Neglect Proceeding and Shinnecock Tribe had right to intervene In Matter of Durpee M, v Samantha Q., 2019 WL 1461831 (2d Dept., 2019) the mother and her husband (father) were the parents of the child, who was born in January 2017. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 12:23 pm
Daniel E. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 11:26 am
’Father failed to heed the family court's admonishment, copying the oldest child's teacher on a September 24, 2014 email to Mother, explaining:`I've copied Mrs. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm
The particular characteristics i.e. roles of the respective parents as (former) MPs (and Minister), e. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
Family Court Act, §1055 (b)(E) was repealed. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 4:29 am
The doctrine protects the status interests of a child in an already recognized and operative parent‑child relationship (Matter of Juanita A. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:34 am
NELSON E. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 9:01 am
An excerpt (paragraph breaks added): John M. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 11:22 am
At this point in the conversation, Arbogast texted that he reread Brandi's first e-mails and told her that he had not had sex with children and was interested in her. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 7:32 pm
Martin and Kathleen E. [read post]
