Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF E. M., CHILD (FATHER)" Results 101 - 120 of 219
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm by Stephen Page
Deane, Dawson & Gaudron JJ held at [16]: “Paternity is a serious matter, both for the father and for the child. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm by Stephen Page
Deane, Dawson & Gaudron JJ held at [16]: “Paternity is a serious matter, both for the father and for the child. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 6:08 pm
I was not swayed by the narrowly-defined study of a clearly tiny sample group by an involved clinician with a potential financial interest in the outcome, as was documented in an article yesterday at Parent Central (h/t Tamara E.) [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 5:47 am by Russell Knight
“In determining whether and to what extent the payments shall be made for the prior period, the court shall consider all relevant facts, including but not limited to: … “The father’s prior willingness or refusal to help raise or support the child” 750 ILCS 46/802(e)(3) It is usually the father that walks out on a mother so the statute uses some sexist language to ask “Why didn’t the mother file for child… [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:09 am by Don Cruse
This is an interesting holding for those who are deciding which issues to appeal, and I’m still digesting how it fits with the recent holding in CERTIFIED EMS, INC. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
There is no mention in the will that Verolin is being disinherited because the father of her child is not black. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 1:39 pm
;c) If unemployed, intentions regarding re-employment, rehabilitation plans (i.e., education and time needed to acquire work experience) and child care; d) Your plans for employment in the future; e) Your plans for retirement. 10. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 9:15 pm
And it's interesting; I'm an executor in an estate just recently. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 10:53 am
We hold that the Contract did not protect M&A from liability under the Crime Victims Statute stemming from M&A's intentional misrepresentations. [read post]