Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF E.G., Minor Child, E.G., Minor Child, Appellant."
Results 1 - 20
of 117
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2016, 4:30 pm
A significant arrears amount, plus interest, accrued. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 11:26 am
See, e.g., A.H. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 5:31 am
First Amendment law also recognizes a variant of that, the "obscene-as-to-minors" or "harmful-to-minors" exception, which has the same three prong but adds (more or less) "as to minors" to each one (so, e.g., material that is seen as having serious value for adults but not for minors can be obscene-as-to-minors but not obscene generally). [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 2:17 pm
Monetary relief can be requested for each year that the minor suffered sexual abuse (e.g., “10,000,000.00 or $1,000,000.00 for each year the minor Plaintiff was sexually assaulted”). [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 7:58 am
He was told to move out after he inappropriately touched a minor child. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:55 pm
See, e.g., Friedrich v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 5:14 am
Additionally, this minor is clearly involved in a sexual act and each video file is of the same minor girl. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 5:54 am
But the appellate court reversed the trial court’s order: With any child custody case, … the paramount concern is the best interests of the child…. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 3:50 pm
Terms in a court order related to minor children (e.g., custody and child support) are modifiable by a court after applying a two-prong analysis. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:33 am
The addendum to the PSR disagreed, explaining that Scott `had the file sharing function of [LimeWire] turned on . . . allowing him to not only receive . . . but to “distribute” child pornography,’ and noting that § 2G2.2(b)(3)(B) applies when a defendant trades child pornography in exchange for more child pornography. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:23 am
The Juvenile Order found “that return of [the minor child] to the joint custody of her parents would be in the best interest of the child. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm
He reiterated the now familiar international materials on the rights of the child which mandate the primacy but not paramountcy of the child’s best interests and the need to avoid stigmatisation in particular. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
Charges have included homicide (when the pregnancy ends in late miscarriage or stillbirth), criminal child endangerment, and drug delivery to a “minor” (the fetus). [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 5:02 am
" This statement of the factor does not adequately address Appellants' interest in this case. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 5:55 am
Past examples include cases turning on a person’s contested status as a descendant (e.g., are you a pretermitted child (click here), or an adopted adult (click here, here), or an adopted-away child (click here), or a descendant by blood (click here), or a posthumously conceived child (click here)); or a person’s contested status as… [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
Glazer, for plaintiff-appellant. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 5:31 am
” See e.g., Myers v. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 3:38 pm
Appellant's conduct was an actual sexual act with an object that may have simulated a minor but plainly was not an actual minor. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 4:37 pm
It hardly could be said that this conversion did not threaten the financial interests of the minor children, whose interests decreased from one-half to one-third. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 11:28 am
In contrast, “[t]he focus of a termination [of parental rights] proceeding is the `best interests’ of the child. [read post]
