Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF G. M. ET AL., CHILDREN (MOTHER)" Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2011, 3:10 am by Lyle Denniston
Board of Chosen Freeholders of Burlington County, et al. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
They used billboards with pictures of mothers and children to draw a comparison between pasteurized milk and irradiation. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am by Joel R. Brandes
Conclusory and nonspecific allegations relating to a change in circumstances are insufficient to justify a hearing on the issue of whether a change in custody would be in the best interests of the child. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 10:53 am
Paul Guardian Insurance, et al , a 12-page opinion, Judge Kirsch writes:Dreaded, Inc. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 1:55 pm by Law Lady
STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Appellee. 1st District.Contracts -- Condominium sale -- Return of deposit to buyer -- Withholding portion of deposit -- Action by buyer seeking to void contract for developer's violation of section 718.202, Florida Statutes, by conditioning return of buyer's deposit upon its lender's consent to return the deposit -- Error to enter summary judgment for defendant developer where there was factual issue as to whether buyer had defaulted… [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 12:32 pm by Veronika Gaertner
The following annotation discusses whether the decision of the OLG München was based on the right grounds. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 11:27 am
Here is the 12/17/03 opinion in D & M Healthcare, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm by James R. Marsh
Attorney’s Office described their alleged criminal acts as follows: Taking action to remove funding for the Luzerne County juvenile detention facility, effectively closing that facility; Ordering juveniles to be sent to the facilities in which they had a financial interest even when juvenile probation officers did not recommend detention; Entering a “Placement Guarantee Agreement” to house children in a facility in which the judges had an interest,… [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm by Steven M. Taber
“The additional environmental projects included in the settlement will protect children, pregnant mothers, local residents and workers from harmful pollution and are an example of securing public health and environmental benefits in addition to those achieved by compliance with our nation’s environmental laws. [read post]