Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF J. B., A CHILD (MOTHER)"
Results 1 - 20
of 271
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2013, 11:44 am
(Termination of parental rights; child neglect; "On appeal, the mother claims that, with respect to Etta, the court made clearly erroneous factual findings that: (1) the Department of Children and Families (department) made reasonable efforts to reunify the mother and Etta; (2) the mother is unable or unwilling to benefit from reunification efforts; (3) the mother failed to achieve sufficient personal rehabilitation under General Statutes § 17a-112… [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:31 pm
Here is my paper: Defining best interests of the child in family law parenting mattersStephen Page[1]INTRODUCTIONOf course we often bandy about the term best interests of a child on a daily basis, but it is good to remember where it comes from. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 12:16 pm
The issues in this case are whether the subject child is a derivatively severely abused child based on the aggravated circumstances of the events that led to the death of her sibling, infant, as defined in Family Court Act § 1012 (j) and Social Services Law § 384-b (8) (a) (i), and whether reasonable efforts to reunite the surviving child with Respondent Mother are required or can be terminated in accordance with Family Court Act §… [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 6:33 am
This case highlights the complex legal issues surrounding child custody and the importance of balancing the interests of all parties involved while at the same time making sure that the best interests of the child are given priority. [read post]
2 May 2013, 2:00 am
Second, Stepfather must show that termination of Father’s rights is in the best interest of the child. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 1:30 am
In re Annia J. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 5:30 am
G-J. [read post]
26 May 2014, 3:16 pm
The Court of Appeals has recognized that when a child's best interests are endangered, such objectives must yield to the State's paramount concern for the health and safety of the child. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 12:48 pm
The Family Court recently ordered that the mother have sole parental responsibility for a child, J, aged 4, and that the father shall not spend time with the child or communicate with the child. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 8:30 am
Nancy J. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 5:16 am
Adjudged Neglected Child, but both the mother and the agency have now waived oral argument, so the case has been submitted on the briefs. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 6:00 am
But on June 2, father petitioned to modify one term of the parties’ Rule 69 agreement: to immediately halt mother’s supervised parenting time in the child’s best interests, alleging it was “extremely detrimental to the emotional health” of their child. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 6:00 am
But on June 2, father petitioned to modify one term of the parties’ Rule 69 agreement: to immediately halt mother’s supervised parenting time in the child’s best interests, alleging it was “extremely detrimental to the emotional health” of their child. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 6:00 am
But on June 2, father petitioned to modify one term of the parties’ Rule 69 agreement: to immediately halt mother’s supervised parenting time in the child’s best interests, alleging it was “extremely detrimental to the emotional health” of their child. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:30 am
Nancy J. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 4:55 pm
In his ruling regarding anonymity Haddon-Cave J provided a text-book summary of the law in relation to open justice and explains his assessment of the law including the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child 1989 especially Arts 3 (best interests a primary consideration); 16 (no child subjected to arbitrary interference with privacy etc) and 40 (privacy of child suspects). [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 6:29 am
B,” who could be the father of the child. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 6:28 pm
(j) A copy of each surrender specified in subsection (a) of this Code section, together with a copy of the acknowledgment specified in subsection (f) of this Code section and a co [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 5:33 pm
A New York Family Lawyer said that, on May 30, 2006, the Administration for Children's Services (ACS) filed a motion pursuant to Family Court Act § 1039-b for entry of an order that finds that reasonable efforts to return the subject child to respondent mother are not required, because the court had entered a finding of severe abuse and aggravated circumstances as defined in Family Court Act § 1012 (j). [read post]
27 May 2011, 2:54 am
The Court of Appeal refused the mother’s appeal from the decision of Pauffley J. [read post]
