Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF J. D., A CHILD (MOTHER)"
Results 1 - 20
of 274
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2011, 3:27 am
"This is a care case with an interesting and unusual twist to it. [read post]
2 May 2013, 2:00 am
Second, Stepfather must show that termination of Father’s rights is in the best interest of the child. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 6:33 am
This case highlights the complex legal issues surrounding child custody and the importance of balancing the interests of all parties involved while at the same time making sure that the best interests of the child are given priority. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 2:00 am
The trial court further concluded that Mother’s conduct constituted a material change in circumstances and that it was in Child’s best interests that Father be designated the primary residential parent. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 2:00 am
The trial court further concluded that Mother’s conduct constituted a material change in circumstances and that it was in Child’s best interests that Father be designated the primary residential parent. [read post]
28 Jul 2006, 10:08 am
He would then, I suspect, move to amend the J/D by adding a Serafin order, either in the J/D itself or in a separate order, plus an amendment of the J/D language to conform to the Supreme Court's requirements. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:30 am
National bodybuilding champion, Ronnie Coleman, was sued for child support by the mother of his children, Jo D. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:14 pm
San Diego Family Law Attorney Nancy J. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 8:30 am
Nancy J. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 6:29 am
I thought I’d pass along an excerpt of an interesting case that was just posted on Westlaw, Matter of P.P. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm
Richard J. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 6:28 pm
(j) A copy of each surrender specified in subsection (a) of this Code section, together with a copy of the acknowledgment specified in subsection (f) of this Code section and a co [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 8:34 pm
In Shondel J. v Mark D., 7 N.Y.3d 320 (2006), the Court of Appeals set forth the law applicable to equitable estoppel in paternity and child support proceedings. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 7:01 am
(d) The length of time the child has lived in a stable, satisfactory environment and the desirability of maintaining continuity. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
D. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 3:05 pm
This court holds that it is not necessary to order a separate best interests hearing relative to (Vernon J. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 2:40 pm
The petition calls for two specific actions, firstly : Ensuring that domestic abuse is identified and its impact fully considered by the family court judiciary and that child arrangements orders put the best interests of the child(ren) first and protect the well-being of the parent the child(ren) is living with, in accordance with Practice Direction 12 J Child Arrangements & Contact Order: Domestic Violence and Harm. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am
Julio J., 20 N.Y.3d 995, 985 N.E.2d 127, 961 N.Y.S.2d 363 (2013) the Court of Appeals observed that before a party can be estopped from denying paternity or from obtaining a DNA test that may establish that he is not the child's biological parent, the court must be convinced that applying equitable estoppel is in the child's best interest (Matter of Shondel J. v Mark D., 7 NY3d 320 [2006]). [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 8:30 am
The MCOA reviewed the best interests’ standard and found that the termination of both parents’ rights was in the best interests of the child. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 11:19 am
Mark D., where a man who agreed to support a child under the mistaken belief that he was the biological father was nonetheless held to his support obligation. [read post]
