Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF M. C., A CHILD" Results 161 - 180 of 1,135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2014, 5:33 am by Lucy Reed
New paragraph (d) of section 10(5) of the Children Act 1989 (see paragraph 5(3)(c) of Schedule 2) would provide that a person who has parental responsibility by virtue of provision under new section 12(2A) is entitled to apply for a child arrangements order. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:30 am by Kate Fort
    I’m granting mother[’s] and father’s 388 as to C., finding there are changed circumstances and that it is in the child’s best interest to be returned to her parents. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 5:11 am
(A-2208-08T2; Decided July 15, 2009): Picture by elvissa Generally, “[m]otions to disqualify [opposing counsel] are viewed with disfavor. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 7:54 am by familoo
The case is the ominously titled C (A Child) (Judicial Conduct) [2019] EWFC B53, and it is an appeal from a named District Judge sitting in Birmingham to a Circuit Judge sitting in Nottingham - the appeal was against a decision made in care proceedings (a placement order), and the appeal was allowed because of the judges shockingly inappropriate conduct. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 4:07 am by Russell Knight
A divorce lawyer needs to know everything from how to value a privately held business to how to determine what a substantial change in circumstances is regarding the best interests of a step-child. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 11:38 pm
  Yesterday's The Australian had a few interesting articles on the debate. [read post]
7 May 2022, 7:53 pm by Russell Knight
The child support or maintenance (formerly known as alimony) owed grows at a 9% interest rate. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 2:30 pm
" Now look at Part IV, para. 51.c. [read post]
1 May 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Platnick outweighs the public interest in protecting Ms. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 3:48 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Regarding Items 3.e, 3.f, 3.g, 3.h, 3.j, 3.k, 3.m, 3.n, 4.b, 4.c, 4.d, 4.e, 4.f, 4.g and 4.h, the inadequacy of the response "Unknown" is self-evident. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 1:20 pm by familoo
I’m not going to analyse the merits of that particular case in this post. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 9:45 am by J
After considering two previous High Court decisions, Arnold J held, at [50] that the power to enforce a charging order (i.e. by order for sale) was, in principle, compatible with the Convention and that (at least in cases brought under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996) any obligation on the court was discharged by considering the factors specified in s.15, 1996 Act: (a) the intention of the parties who created the trust; (b) the purpose for which the property is held;… [read post]