Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF R. P., A CHILD"
Results 81 - 100
of 832
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2013, 7:50 am
The pinpoint citation in the P.3d portion will need to have the reporter page number. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:27 am
Rivero, 216 P.3d 213 (Rivero II) added a new requirement to the previous Nevada ‘changed circumstances’ standard. [read post]
16 May 2009, 11:40 pm
Elizabeth Cohen, of CNN, authored an interesting article on the difficult task of receiving insurance coverage for a pre-existing condition. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 8:46 pm
The case came before the Court in an appeal from the accused’s conviction of a charge of possession of child pornography and a dismissal of a charge of making child pornography available using the P2P Limewire file sharing program. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 8:46 pm
The case came before the Court in an appeal from the accused’s conviction of a charge of possession of child pornography and a dismissal of a charge of making child pornography available using the P2P Limewire file sharing program. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 6:12 am
She further claimed that "[t]he only reason [she] paid these expenses without seeking contribution [was] because [p]laintiff continued to pay the additional child support." [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 2:22 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative LawSource: Justia November 11, 2011 Farris v. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 1:03 am
Plaintiff filed two applications: one for Childhood Disability Benefits as a Disabled Adult Child and another for Supplemental Security Income benefits. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:33 am
As to child support, the answer is a definitive "no. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 5:48 am
"[I]dentifying information about [P]etitioner (to protect her safety and effectuate the [c]hild's privacy concerns)," to include Petitioner's home address and other personal information; and 3. [read post]
31 May 2015, 9:01 pm
Harold R. [read post]
31 May 2015, 9:01 pm
Harold R. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 3:22 pm
” The supervisory jurisdiction (to the extent that it can be ousted at all) could only be ousted “by the most clear and explicit words”: see per Denning LJ in R v Medical Appeal Tribunal ex p. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
Wife contributed $98,000.00 toward her one-half interest in the Vero Beach Property. [read post]
3 May 2016, 3:50 am
R. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 1:16 pm
In any of the above cases, it is important to hire an attorney to make sure that you are treated fairly during the process and your financial interests are protected. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:42 am
” (Id. at p. 251.) [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 1:11 pm
The lawyers at James P. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 11:01 am
In 2011, a Texas court entered an “agreed order” appointing Young as Child’s “sole managing conservator” and limiting Hagel to “reasonable supervised visitation,” finding that it would not be in Child’s best interest for Hagel to have “specific periods of possession” of Child. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 10:06 am
Reversed and remanded in part.Case Name: IN THE INTEREST OF NC and AM, Minor Children, SC and FC, III v. [read post]
