Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF S.B., A CHILD" Results 21 - 40 of 68
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Supreme Court might be prepared to recognize parental interests in a person who intends, and is intended by the conceiving parent, as the second of the two parents a child would have. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 12:32 pm by Unknown
Seminole Tribe of Florida (Sovereign Immunity) State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlThe People in the Interest of S.B. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Granville(2000), in which it held that a Washington statute that allowed any person to petition for visitation with someone else’s child based solely on the child’s best interests could not be constitutionally applied to override a mother’s decision to curtail visitation with her children’s paternal grandparents.That ruling, although only a plurality, sharply differentiated between parents and non-parents and took a robust view of the parental right… [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:43 pm by Daniel Pollack
It is axiomatic that trauma to one child reverberates throughout the family, disrupting its balance and creating potential dire consequences for the non-abused siblings (Hill, 2003).4 For this reason, as Hollingsworth, Glass and Heisler (2007) write, “It is imperative during an investigation of abuse in which a targeted child has endured physical abuse, neglect, or bizarre discipline that the siblings also be evaluated”(pp. 84-85).5 Just as we rigorously evaluate… [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 9:26 am by PJ Blount
The second is S.B. 1337, it reads: SENATE BILL NO. 1337 Offered January 12, 2011 Prefiled January 12, 2011 A BILL to amend and reenact §§ 2.2-3705.6 and 2.2-3711 of the Code of Virginia, relating to the Freedom of Information Act; Commercial Space Flight Authority. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 10:44 am by Dave Maass
In anticipation of that deadline, the General Assembly passed H.B. 2125 and S.B. 1301. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am by Joel R. Brandes
” In holding that Domestic Relations Law § 70 “permits a non-biological, non-adoptive parent to achieve standing to petition for custody and visitation” (Brooke S.B., 28 NY3d at 27), the Court of Appeals stressed that it “has gone to great lengths to escape the inequitable results dictated by a needlessly narrow interpretation of the term ‘parent’ ” (Brooke S.B. at 24). [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:36 pm
The system isn't even truthful, applying the tag "sex offender/child-victim offender" to people in all three tiers -- even if the victim wasn't a child at all. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm by Joel R. Brandes
March 16, 2020 Recent Articles of Interest          An article by Joel R. [read post]
27 May 2011, 3:28 pm by Kiera Flynn
At Volokh, Jonathan Adler discusses interesting voting line-ups in Fowler and Camreta. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
 It found that petitioner failed to make prima facie showing of a recognized and operative parent-child relationship where the status interests of the child needed to be protected by imposing equitable estoppel. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm by Joel R. Brandes
It observed that equitable estoppel requires careful scrutiny of the child=s relationship with the relevant adult and is ultimately based upon the best interest of the child. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm by Joel R. Brandes
It observed that equitable estoppel requires careful scrutiny of the child=s relationship with the relevant adult and is ultimately based upon the best interest of the child. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Larry Nassar and his hundreds of victims.The USOC has been roundly criticized for putting children’s interests second to medals and money. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm by Tom Goldstein
  The Court did not take center stage by deciding the constitutional challenges we are watching most closely:  the cases involving the health care reform statute, Arizona’s S.B. 1070 immigration law, or the upcoming dispute on California’s Proposition 8 on gay marriage. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am by Joel R. Brandes
Conclusory and nonspecific allegations relating to a change in circumstances are insufficient to justify a hearing on the issue of whether a change in custody would be in the best interests of the child. [read post]