Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF J.P., A JUVENILE (Majority)"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2007, 3:07 am
Age does matter, and a developmental perspective is needed to inform decisions about how and at what points in the legal process age should be taken into account. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
The court agreed with the day laborers that the ordinance was a facially unconstitutional restriction on speech where the ordinance failed to satisfy the narrow tailoring element of the Supreme Court's time, place, and manner test and where the ordinance was not narrowly tailored because it regulated significantly more speech than was necessary to achieve the city's purpose of improving traffic safety and traffic flow at two major intersections. [read post]
