Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF R.H."
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2008, 4:18 pm
For publication opinions today (0): NFP civil opinions today (2): In the Matter of R.H., III, T.H., and A.H.; and... [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 10:34 am
R.H., App. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 11:58 am
Darnell H. and R.H. appealed the order granting jurisdiction over Marquis, arguing that California law limits the court's jurisdiction to matters involving an abused child or the child's siblings. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 10:28 am
R.H., App. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 12:00 pm
Coase, R.H. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 6:34 am
It doesn't matter whether we assign the right to the farmer or the railroad. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 1:52 pm
It doesn't matter whether we assign the right to the farmer or the railroad. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 5:58 am
It was further alleged that the said R.H. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 7:47 am
R.H. matter made recommendations regarding the prospective categories of evidence. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 12:30 am
The New Rambler has a review of Natural Law in Court: A History of Legal Theory in Practice by R.H. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 1:39 pm
Lawrence (Jurisdiction - Contracts)State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2018.htmlIn re R.H. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 1:39 pm
Lawrence (Jurisdiction - Contracts)State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2018.htmlIn re R.H. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 5:31 am
"Prurient" interest is not the same as a candid, normal, or healthy interest in sex, rather it is a "'shameful or morbid interest in nudity, sex, or excretion [which] goes substantially beyond customary limits of candor in description or representation of such matters.'" Furthermore, as noted previously, this court has accepted a definition of prurient as "an appeal to an unhealthy, abnormal, unwholesome, degrading, shameful, or morbid interest in sex. [read post]
29 May 2009, 2:18 pm
R.H. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 9:35 am
R.H. [read post]
11 May 2014, 12:38 pm
As modified by the court, the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County for further proceedings. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 8:50 am
See, e.g., R.H. v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 12:21 pm
Specifically, Thornberry argues that the grant of summary judgment was erroneous because the designated evidence established as a matter of law that Hobart violated certain provisions of the Open Door Law1 with regard to the termination proceedings and because there were genuine issues of material fact as to whether Thornberry was properly notified that his leave under the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) would run concurrently with his paid leave that Hobart provided. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
It doesn't matter whether we assign the right to the farmer or the railroad. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 4:08 pm
The idea that we call the Coase Theorem was advanced in a very famous paper: Coase, R.H. [read post]
