Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF THE COMMITMENT OF J.B" Results 1 - 20 of 45
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2017, 12:23 pm by Joel R. Brandes
These began with Petitioner’s request that Respondent “confirm [her] commitment to our agreement” that J.B. would return to Germany for the 2016-17 academic year. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 6:45 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
” The arbitrator found that J.B. lacked a commitment to his treatment programs. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:43 pm by PaulKostro
In the Matter of the Expungement of J.B., 426 N.J. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Shepherd expressed no interest in the child’s birth and did not, despite a contractual commitment to the contrary, add the baby to her health insurance policy. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 12:30 pm by Michael Ginsborg
Abbott also claims that Texas law does not restrict J.B.'s freedom of association or right to travel: "it simply refuses to extend legal enforcement to the promises and commitments outside the legal institution of marriage. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 12:10 pm
" In the Matter of Au.B., Al.B., K.B. and M.B., Children in Need of Services; J.B. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 12:37 am
While the CCA can consider statutes that are "so closely related" to criminal matters under the criminal law matter jurisdiction, this case was more of a civil law matter that happens to stem from a criminal judgment. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 7:27 am
The court committed Lewis to 90 days in county jail with 85 days of credit for time served. [read post]
24 May 2014, 7:41 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The courts have interpreted sexual molestation to be an intentional act as a matter of law. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 6:07 pm
The Board of Trustees of Vincennes University (NFP) In the Matter of S.R., Tamela R. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 10:36 am by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
The court went on to say: “Although Vallejos was able to pursue a civil action based upon exceptions to the workers’ compensation statute, the trial court correctly granted summary judgment in favor of the appellees because the “gross negligence” and “unrelated works” exceptions do not apply as a matter of law, and taking the facts in the light most favorable to Vallejos, he cannot prove that Infinity was grossly negligent or that Lan committed… [read post]