Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF WHITTINGTON"
Results 41 - 60
of 234
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2019, 12:06 pm
Leaders of both parties should learn some lessons from this presidency, no matter how it ends, and reexamine Congress's capacity to do its job — and the extent to which we have been relying on the good character and judgment of individuals in the White House to keep the government on an even keel. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 9:06 am
It is a straightforward matter to make it explicit that a president cannot pardon himself, and it should not be hard to take pardons of immediate family members off the table as well. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 5:00 am
Their work sometimes involves matters of arcane knowledge and obscure significance, but it often involves matters of fundamental values and partisan contestation. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 12:09 pm
The process of impeachment might be a matter of constitutional construction, and the longstanding federal construction is that an impeachment occurs at the moment the House votes to adopt an impeachment resolution. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 8:20 am
The third section asks whether any of this matters. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 6:52 pm
Universities in particular should model such tolerance precisely because universities are important sites for public debate about matters of general concern. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 12:51 pm
On matters related to race, the proposal advises scholars not to follow evidence wherever it may lead but rather to question whether the evidence serves the desired political narrative. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 7:26 am
The chancellor of UIC has now dug in his heels on the matter. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:01 pm
Moreover, she and Stanford's president announced that they believe the university should "generally refrain from taking institutional positions on complex political or global matters that extend beyond our immediate purview. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 12:20 pm
The school as such could not prefer Black Lives Matter posters to MAGA hats, and could not base employment decisions on such preferences. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 2:46 pm
The AAUP might say that professors should not intentionally interject controversial matters unrelated to the course into their classroom, but Meriwether says professors are protected by the First Amendment if they do so and those controversial matters are matters of public concern. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 8:37 am
If we were discussing a new permanent social program, then such design details would matter a great deal and should be central to the debate, but we are not. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 4:29 pm
The answer matters more in the states, where some constitutions provide for the suspension of an officer upon his impeachment. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 11:55 am
But the distinction does sometimes matter in the states, because some state constitutions indicate that an impeached officer is suspended from his office until such a time that he is acquitted in an impeachment trial. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 12:47 pm
A lawsuit against the university on this matter is still ongoing. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 1:47 pm
Teachers are entitled to freedom in the classroom in discussing their subject, but they should be careful not to introduce into their teaching controversial matter which has no relation to their subject. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 4:57 am
Supreme Court eventually recognized First Amendment protections for government employees, including state university professors, who express themselves about matters of public concern. [read post]
29 May 2019, 5:00 am
Does any of this matter? [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 7:38 am
Again from the letter: The Academic Freedom Alliance stands firmly behind Professor Alonzo in this matter. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 9:24 am
Supreme Court has also recognized a limited First Amendment right for government employees to speak about matters of public concern. [read post]
