Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF WHITTINGTON"
Results 61 - 80
of 233
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2021, 2:46 pm
The AAUP might say that professors should not intentionally interject controversial matters unrelated to the course into their classroom, but Meriwether says professors are protected by the First Amendment if they do so and those controversial matters are matters of public concern. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 4:04 am
*Donohue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562** Siddaway v Board of Governors of Bethlem Hospital [1985] AC 871*** Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11**** Briody v St Helens and Knowsley Health Authority [2001] EWCA Civ 1010**** XX v Whittington [2020 UKSC 14 [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 7:43 am
As a matter of formal law, she could. [read post]
4 May 2021, 12:53 pm
As a threshold matter, we sought to determine whether the blog post at issue was protected by our policy on academic freedom. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 9:53 pm
But truth does't matter. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 10:00 am
As a general matter, the larger the commission, the more difficult it will be to reach a consensus. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 9:37 am
Whether that backing takes the form of an official "recommendation" may not matter much. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 6:15 pm
At their Online Library of Liberty site, the Liberty Fund has started a new Liberty Matters series. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 10:35 am
What matters is that 140 law professors submitted a letter arguing against Trump's First Amendment defenses. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 3:19 pm
And the brief cites several posts from Volokh Conspiracy co-bloggers Jonathan Adler, Ilya Somin, and Keith Whittington. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 9:53 am
" Other distinguished scholars – Andrew Hyman, Noah Feldman, and Keith Whittington – have made essentially the same argument. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 1:47 pm
Another VC co-blogger, Keith Whittington, did not sign the letter, but has written an excellent article on Lawfare reaching the same conclusion. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 5:00 am
It would not matter if a judge made such pronouncements from the bench or on social media or at a lectern. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 9:28 am
Kristen Eichensehr shared her AEGIS series paper explaining how the U.S. policy of “defend forward” in cyberspace raises the stakes of cyber attack attribution questions as a matter of both international and domestic law. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 9:17 am
This issue would not normally matter, but it might matter in this peculiar circumstance. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 12:08 pm
The truth, as Keith Whittington notes, is that “validity of a presidential self-pardon is an issue of genuine uncertainty. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 1:17 pm
And that difference doesn't matter for First Amendment purposes. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:21 pm
Does it matter if we assume that Trump's speech would be protected? [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 5:08 pm
If Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance is inclined to pursue charges against Trump (or any of his relatives or associates, for that matter), a federal pardon will not stand in the way. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 2:41 pm
As co-blogger Keith Whittington explains, Trump's efforts to get GOP-controlled state legislators to appoint pro-Trump electors in states where Joe Biden won the popular vote are also nearly certain to fail. [read post]
