Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF WHITTINGTON"
Results 101 - 120
of 233
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
For the symposium on Ken Kersch, Conservatives and the Constitution (Cambridge University Press, 2019).Gary LawsonI came of intellectual age in the Southern California libertarian hotbed of the late 1970s. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 9:53 am
" Other distinguished scholars – Andrew Hyman, Noah Feldman, and Keith Whittington – have made essentially the same argument. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 11:41 am
Version 7: Courts as a matter of history have engaged in interpretation. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 6:57 am
Porter is a relatively rare case on "intramural speech," internal faculty speech about matters of university governance and policy, and the decision is an important one in concluding that such speech does not merit constitutional protection. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 8:00 am
" Whittington's 2019 book, Repugnant Laws, shows that the familiar assumption that the Supreme Court did not use judicial review to limit or strike down Congressional statutes between Marbury and Dred Scott is false. [read post]
17 May 2023, 6:30 am
No matter how dysfunctional the constitutional system might seem, the political costs of simply stepping outside of that system have been high. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 7:06 pm
Senators can put this matter in the hands of the voters, but they need not endorse a flawed understanding of the Constitution in order to do so. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 4:30 am
Written by Jack Whittington [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 8:27 am
It is not hard to see how this assertion of a unilateral power to reassign instructors who offend their students could have sweeping consequences for the freedom of university professors to teach contentious subject matter. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 8:00 am
Since state universities are also governmental actors, and state universities maintain social media accounts, it was only a matter of time before these questions intersected with campus speech disputes. [read post]
28 May 2019, 5:00 am
The question was thought to matter because the history implied something about how legitimate the power of judicial review might be and how aggressively the courts should use it. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:46 am
My inclination is to look at the matter less normatively, and more empirically. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 6:42 am
Scholars such as Randy Barnett, Keith Whittington, and Jack Balkin have offered thoughtful proposals for how judges should handle the enterprise of constitutional construction. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:52 am
The difference is a matter of degree, but the degree of difference is substantial. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:43 am
At the national level, Washington has penalties, such as cutting off federal funds, that are supposed to disincent states from diverting 911 fees, but that turns out to be a matter of nomenclature. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 6:00 am
Of course, it isn't the particular terminology that matters, but the substance of the distinction is not something that legal theorists can do without. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 4:04 am
*Donohue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562** Siddaway v Board of Governors of Bethlem Hospital [1985] AC 871*** Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11**** Briody v St Helens and Knowsley Health Authority [2001] EWCA Civ 1010**** XX v Whittington [2020 UKSC 14 [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 4:26 am
Whittington examined the possibility of Congress impeaching an executive branch official who is not the president. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 11:42 am
Keith Whittington made this point in his article on the New Originalism in 2004. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 4:20 am
As Brian Leiter notes, there’s a huge gap between swearing allegiance to anti-racism and believing that black lives matter. [read post]
